‘Less Is More’: Consumer Spending and the Size of Economic Stimulus Payments

We study how consumption responds to unexpected, transitory income gains of different sizes using hypothetical questions from the Italian Survey of Household Income and Wealth. Affluent households exhibit higher marginal propensities to consume (MPCs) out of large gains, while liquidity-poor families show higher MPCs out of small gains.The spending patterns of higher earners align with models featuring non-homothetic preferences, whereas borrowing constraints explain the heterogeneity among low-income households. Our findings imply that, for a given fiscal outlay, distributing smaller transfers to a broader group of low-income households stimulates aggregate consumption more effectively than concentrating larger transfers among fewer recipients. (JEL D12, E21, E62, G51, H23)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Macroeconomics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20220169
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Less Is More’: Consumer Spending and the Size of Economic Stimulus Payments

Michele Andreolli, Paolo Surico
5 citations
American Economic Journal Macroeconomics
Housing Market and Economics
3.13
article

‘Less Is More’: Consumer Spending and the Size of Economic Stimulus Payments

Michele Andreolli, Paolo Surico
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We study how consumption responds to unexpected, transitory income gains of different sizes using hypothetical questions from the Italian Survey of Household Income and Wealth. Affluent households exhibit higher marginal propensities to consume (MPCs) out of large gains, while liquidity-poor families show higher MPCs out of small gains.The spending patterns of higher earners align with models featuring non-homothetic preferences, whereas borrowing constraints explain the heterogeneity among low-income households. Our findings imply that, for a given fiscal outlay, distributing smaller transfers to a broader group of low-income households stimulates aggregate consumption more effectively than concentrating larger transfers among fewer recipients. (JEL D12, E21, E62, G51, H23)

American Economic Journal MacroeconomicsVol. 18(1)
Boston College (US), International Monetary Fund (US), London Business School (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Housing Market and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.