Learning from generic language.

{"Generic":[0],"language":[1],"(e.g.,":[2],"\\"Birds":[3],"have":[4,144],"hollow":[5],"bones\\")":[6],"conveys":[7],"generalizations":[8],"about":[9,20,124],"categories":[10],"and":[11,15,71,117,180],"is":[12,29,59,96,113],"a":[13,42,66,83,114,132,145,153,157,166],"fundamental":[14],"ubiquitous":[16],"mechanism":[17],"of":[18,45,134,156,197,202,217,244,255,259,262],"learning":[19,26],"the":[21,93,103,125,137,186,194,211,214,222,252],"world.":[22],"How":[23],"exactly":[24],"this":[25,129],"occurs,":[27],"however,":[28],"unclear:":[30],"Generics":[31],"exhibit":[32],"so":[33],"much":[34],"flexibility":[35],"in":[36,102,149,175,224],"how":[37,46],"they":[38],"are":[39,165,237],"interpreted":[40],"that":[41,74,92,213,235],"quantitative":[43,154,257],"theory":[44],"generics":[47,75,143,164,191,236],"update":[48,76],"beliefs":[49,77,123],"has":[50],"not":[51,53],"only":[52],"been":[54],"developed":[55],"or":[56],"tested,":[57],"but":[58,141],"often":[60],"explicitly":[61],"dismissed.":[62],"Here,":[63],"we":[64,151,177,184],"explore":[65],"hypothesis":[67],"introduced":[68],"by":[69,119,229],"Tessler":[70,230],"Goodman":[72,232],"(2019)":[73,233],"via":[78],"an":[79,238],"uncertain":[80,116,187],"threshold":[81],"like":[82],"vague":[84],"quantifier:":[85],"A":[86],"category–property":[87],"generic":[88,204,218,225,263],"(Ks":[89],"F)":[90],"means":[91],"property":[94],"F":[95],"expected":[97],"to":[98,131,161,169,190,192,251],"be":[99,193],"relatively":[100,111],"widespread":[101,112],"category":[104],"K,":[105],"where":[106,142,163],"what":[107],"counts":[108],"as":[109,227],"being":[110],"priori":[115],"resolved":[118],"consulting":[120],"one’s":[121],"prior":[122,182],"property.":[126],"We":[127],"compare":[128],"model":[130,155,216],"family":[133],"alternatives":[135],"with":[136,210],"same":[138,215],"background":[139],"knowledge":[140,245],"fixed,":[146],"precise":[147],"meaning;":[148],"addition,":[150],"formalize":[152],"strictly":[158],"conceptual-based":[159],"approach":[160,189],"generics,":[162],"direct":[167],"connection":[168],"conceptual":[170],"knowledge.":[171],"Across":[172],"three":[173],"experiments":[174],"which":[176],"both":[178],"measure":[179],"manipulate":[181],"beliefs,":[183],"find":[185],"meaning":[188,219],"best":[195],"explanation":[196],"participants’":[198],"highly":[199],"heterogeneous":[200],"interpretations":[201],"novel":[203],"statements.":[205],"This":[206,248],"result":[207,212],"taken":[208],"together":[209],"can":[220],"explain":[221],"variability":[223],"endorsements":[226],"shown":[228],"&":[231],"suggests":[234],"effective":[239],"medium":[240],"for":[241],"faithful":[242],"transmission":[243],"between":[246],"interlocutors.":[247],"work":[249],"adds":[250],"growing":[253],"enterprise":[254],"formal,":[256],"studies":[258],"human":[260],"understanding":[261],"language.":[264]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Review
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000632
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Learning from generic language.

Noah D. Goodman, Michael Henry Tessler
5 citations
Psychological Review
Natural Language Processing Techniques
6.68
article

Learning from generic language.

Noah D. Goodman, Michael Henry Tessler
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Generic language (e.g., "Birds have hollow bones") conveys generalizations about categories and is a fundamental and ubiquitous mechanism of learning about the world. How exactly this learning occurs, however, is unclear: Generics exhibit so much flexibility in how they are interpreted that a quantitative theory of how generics update beliefs has not only not been developed or tested, but is often explicitly dismissed. Here, we explore a hypothesis introduced by Tessler and Goodman (2019) that generics update beliefs via an uncertain threshold like a vague quantifier: A category–property generic (Ks F) means that the property F is expected to be relatively widespread in the category K, where what counts as being relatively widespread is a priori uncertain and resolved by consulting one’s prior beliefs about the property. We compare this model to a family of alternatives with the same background knowledge but where generics have a fixed, precise meaning; in addition, we formalize a quantitative model of a strictly conceptual-based approach to generics, where generics are a direct connection to conceptual knowledge. Across three experiments in which we both measure and manipulate prior beliefs, we find the uncertain meaning approach to generics to be the best explanation of participants’ highly heterogeneous interpretations of novel generic statements. This result taken together with the result that the same model of generic meaning can explain the variability in generic endorsements as shown by Tessler & Goodman (2019) suggests that generics are an effective medium for faithful transmission of knowledge between interlocutors. This work adds to the growing enterprise of formal, quantitative studies of human understanding of generic language.

Psychological Review
Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.