Re-orienting the sustainable development snake

Efforts toward sustainable development are failing. The reason is that the concept of sustainable development no longer provides an adequate umbrella for the main challenge currently faced by global environmental governance, namely implementation. The very strengths of the concept of sustainable development are turning into fatal weaknesses. Vague enough to bring all States and other stakeholders to the table of negotiations, the concept of sustainable development was very successful in managing the political collision between ‘development’ and ‘environment’ throughout the 1980s and the 1990s. It was a formidable tool to find balance as well as for normative development. But it is inadequate to move forward to the next phase, i.e. implementation. This article introduces an alternative model, based on four strategic priorities (participation, differentiation, decarbonisation, innovation and technology dissemination). It maps different levels at which these priorities could be pursued in order to make global environmental governance more effective. The article is not against the concept of ‘sustainable development’ as a worthy fight, but as a weapon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71609/iheid-3dgt-pd09
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-orienting the sustainable development snake

Jorge E. Viñuales
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Re-orienting the sustainable development snake

Jorge E. Viñuales
article en

Abstract

Efforts toward sustainable development are failing. The reason is that the concept of sustainable development no longer provides an adequate umbrella for the main challenge currently faced by global environmental governance, namely implementation. The very strengths of the concept of sustainable development are turning into fatal weaknesses. Vague enough to bring all States and other stakeholders to the table of negotiations, the concept of sustainable development was very successful in managing the political collision between ‘development’ and ‘environment’ throughout the 1980s and the 1990s. It was a formidable tool to find balance as well as for normative development. But it is inadequate to move forward to the next phase, i.e. implementation. This article introduces an alternative model, based on four strategic priorities (participation, differentiation, decarbonisation, innovation and technology dissemination). It maps different levels at which these priorities could be pursued in order to make global environmental governance more effective. The article is not against the concept of ‘sustainable development’ as a worthy fight, but as a weapon.

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Re-orienting the sustainable development snake — Jorge E. Viñuales · Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS