Studying the History of the Cross-Border Region as a Factor of Intercultural Harmonization

The globalization process of the modern world, the creation of transnational corporations, the strengthening of migration processes, widespread integration and interpenetration contribute to the leveling of the ethno-historical and cultural features of different peoples. However, on the other hand, the same processes cause active opposition among representatives of certain ethnic groups, who are struggling to maintain their identity, up to the clarification of relations at the level of intercultural conflicts. The threat of assimilation and loss of the national traits strengthens nationalist sentiments: the peoples begin to value their culture, history, traditions; are going to protect the distinctive features from the unifying impact of globalization. There have been many cases in history when state power tried to eradicate the national spirit of the peoples who were part of the empire. One such example is the national policy of the Soviet totalitarian state. At the legislative level, every nation in the USSR had the right to independent development within the state, but in fact any, even the most minimal manifestations of national specificity or loyalty to national traditions, were brutally persecuted. Forced russification, the creation of the ephemeral community “Soviet people”, deliberate “correction” of history, deportation, and forcible resettlement of representatives of various ethnic groups - this is not an exhaustive list of steps taken by the Soviet government to create a single state. And we all know how these experiments ended. Knowledge of the principles of intercultural communication, of its mechanisms and characteristics, is important not only at the interstate level, but also for personal development, because understanding the differences between cultures, the history of peoples, and external manifestations significantly expands the horizons of an individual, his idea of ​​the world and himself, as a carrier of a certain culture. The combination in solving these problems - on the one hand, the intensification of globalization processes, on the other - the preservation of unique cultural values and norms inevitably leads to the conclusion that it is important and necessary for modern man to know the principles and strategies of intercultural communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACROSS Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-border Studies
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35219/across.2020.3.1.16
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying the History of the Cross-Border Region as a Factor of Intercultural Harmonization

Lilia Tsyganenko
1 citations
ACROSS Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-border Studies
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
article

Studying the History of the Cross-Border Region as a Factor of Intercultural Harmonization

Lilia Tsyganenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The globalization process of the modern world, the creation of transnational corporations, the strengthening of migration processes, widespread integration and interpenetration contribute to the leveling of the ethno-historical and cultural features of different peoples. However, on the other hand, the same processes cause active opposition among representatives of certain ethnic groups, who are struggling to maintain their identity, up to the clarification of relations at the level of intercultural conflicts. The threat of assimilation and loss of the national traits strengthens nationalist sentiments: the peoples begin to value their culture, history, traditions; are going to protect the distinctive features from the unifying impact of globalization. There have been many cases in history when state power tried to eradicate the national spirit of the peoples who were part of the empire. One such example is the national policy of the Soviet totalitarian state. At the legislative level, every nation in the USSR had the right to independent development within the state, but in fact any, even the most minimal manifestations of national specificity or loyalty to national traditions, were brutally persecuted. Forced russification, the creation of the ephemeral community “Soviet people”, deliberate “correction” of history, deportation, and forcible resettlement of representatives of various ethnic groups - this is not an exhaustive list of steps taken by the Soviet government to create a single state. And we all know how these experiments ended. Knowledge of the principles of intercultural communication, of its mechanisms and characteristics, is important not only at the interstate level, but also for personal development, because understanding the differences between cultures, the history of peoples, and external manifestations significantly expands the horizons of an individual, his idea of ​​the world and himself, as a carrier of a certain culture. The combination in solving these problems - on the one hand, the intensification of globalization processes, on the other - the preservation of unique cultural values and norms inevitably leads to the conclusion that it is important and necessary for modern man to know the principles and strategies of intercultural communication.

ACROSS Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-border StudiesVol. 3(1)
Izmail State University of Humanities (UA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.