Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Aggregate and Distributional Effects

Abstract We evaluate the aggregate and distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies using a multi-sector equilibrium model with intersectoral input-output linkages and worker heterogeneity, calibrated to various countries. Carbon taxes induce changes in relative prices and input reallocation, notably in labour. In the United States, achieving its Paris Agreement commitment results in, at most, a 0.8% reduction in output, unevenly affecting different sectors and individuals. Some workers in dirty energy sectors, forming less than 2% of the labour force, endure welfare losses six times larger than others. China, reliant on high-carbon energy, experiences larger economic effects from an identical emission reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae113
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Aggregate and Distributional Effects

Cezar Santos, Zeina Hasna, Tiago Calvacanti
2 citations
The Economic Journal
Climate Change Policy and Economics
2.26
article

Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Aggregate and Distributional Effects

Cezar Santos, Zeina Hasna, Tiago Calvacanti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We evaluate the aggregate and distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies using a multi-sector equilibrium model with intersectoral input-output linkages and worker heterogeneity, calibrated to various countries. Carbon taxes induce changes in relative prices and input reallocation, notably in labour. In the United States, achieving its Paris Agreement commitment results in, at most, a 0.8% reduction in output, unevenly affecting different sectors and individuals. Some workers in dirty energy sectors, forming less than 2% of the labour force, endure welfare losses six times larger than others. China, reliant on high-carbon energy, experiences larger economic effects from an identical emission reduction.

The Economic JournalVol. 135(668)
International Monetary Fund (US), Inter-American Development Bank (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), Escola de Economia de São Paulo
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Aggregate and Distributional Effects — Cezar Santos, Zeina Hasna, et al. · The Economic Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS