Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay

Abstract The concept of Open Innovation (OI) has breathed new life into both empirical research and industry practice concerned with distributed and collaborative modes of innovating. While much of the empirical literature has emphasised the innovation enhancing benefits, our study extends existing work that has recorded the limits to open innovation. Using a sample of Belgian firms, we document that open innovation leads to higher rates of project abandonment and to lower rates of project completion; the latter suggesting the presence of delays and interruptions. Among other robustness tests, we address the concern that openness could be endogenous with regard to project abandonment. As we also find that higher abandonment rates coincide with lower future firm performance, we conclude that open innovation may have negative effects on firms’ innovation outcomes because of higher rates of project failures and hold-ups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10261-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay

Dirk Czarnitzki, Mark Freel, Kristof Van Criekingen
2 citations
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
article

Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay

Dirk Czarnitzki, Mark Freel, Kristof Van Criekingen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The concept of Open Innovation (OI) has breathed new life into both empirical research and industry practice concerned with distributed and collaborative modes of innovating. While much of the empirical literature has emphasised the innovation enhancing benefits, our study extends existing work that has recorded the limits to open innovation. Using a sample of Belgian firms, we document that open innovation leads to higher rates of project abandonment and to lower rates of project completion; the latter suggesting the presence of delays and interruptions. Among other robustness tests, we address the concern that openness could be endogenous with regard to project abandonment. As we also find that higher abandonment rates coincide with lower future firm performance, we conclude that open innovation may have negative effects on firms’ innovation outcomes because of higher rates of project failures and hold-ups.

The Journal of Technology Transfer
University of Ottawa (CA), Centre for European Economic Research (DE), Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BE), Lancaster University (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay — Dirk Czarnitzki, Mark Freel, et al. · The Journal of Technology Transfer (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS