Going green in China: Firms' responses to stricter environmental regulations

Abstract This paper finds that major 2006 Chinese environmental reforms creating mandatory emission reduction targets led firms to significantly reduce emissions, especially for firms in more polluting industries. A decomposition of the overall effect shows that firms relied primarily on technology upgrading (75.3%) rather than output cuts (24.7%) in meeting the regulatory changes. The driving forces for this “technique effect” are more water recycling and abatement device adoption. While polluting firms did not increase their green innovation, local equipment manufacturers—likely suppliers—did significantly increase green water patent applications, indicating an expanded environmental service market effect. Tests on firms' economic responses provide more evidence for an “internal” variant of the pollution haven hypothesis because firms' profit, capital, employment, market shares, and entry were all negatively affected by the more stringent regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12756
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
59.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Going green in China: Firms' responses to stricter environmental regulations

Zonglai Kou, Joshua Graff Zivin, Xueyue Liu, Haichao Fan et al.
24 citations
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
59.49
article

Going green in China: Firms' responses to stricter environmental regulations

Zonglai Kou, Joshua Graff Zivin, Xueyue Liu, Haichao Fan, Huanhuan Wang
article en
24 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper finds that major 2006 Chinese environmental reforms creating mandatory emission reduction targets led firms to significantly reduce emissions, especially for firms in more polluting industries. A decomposition of the overall effect shows that firms relied primarily on technology upgrading (75.3%) rather than output cuts (24.7%) in meeting the regulatory changes. The driving forces for this “technique effect” are more water recycling and abatement device adoption. While polluting firms did not increase their green innovation, local equipment manufacturers—likely suppliers—did significantly increase green water patent applications, indicating an expanded environmental service market effect. Tests on firms' economic responses provide more evidence for an “internal” variant of the pollution haven hypothesis because firms' profit, capital, employment, market shares, and entry were all negatively affected by the more stringent regulation.

Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économiqueVol. 58(1)
Fudan University (CN), University of California San Diego (US), East China Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
59.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.