Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy

Online political microtargeting involves monitoring people's online behaviour, and using the collected data, sometimes enriched with other data, to show people-targeted political advertisements. Online political microtargeting is widely used in the US; Europe may not be far behind. This paper maps microtargeting's promises and threats to democracy. For example, microtargeting promises to optimise the match between the electorate's concerns and political campaigns, and to boost campaign engagement and political participation. But online microtargeting could also threaten democracy. For instance, a political party could, misleadingly, present itself as a different one-issue party to different individuals. And data collection for microtargeting raises privacy concerns. We sketch possibilities for policymakers if they seek to regulate online political microtargeting. We discuss which measures would be possible, while complying with the right to freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.17712
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy

Kristina Irion, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, R. Ó Fathaigh, Balázs Bodó et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy

Kristina Irion, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, R. Ó Fathaigh, Balázs Bodó, Claes H. de Vreese, Judith Moeller, Tom Dobber, Sanne Kruikemeier
article en

Abstract

Online political microtargeting involves monitoring people's online behaviour, and using the collected data, sometimes enriched with other data, to show people-targeted political advertisements. Online political microtargeting is widely used in the US; Europe may not be far behind. This paper maps microtargeting's promises and threats to democracy. For example, microtargeting promises to optimise the match between the electorate's concerns and political campaigns, and to boost campaign engagement and political participation. But online microtargeting could also threaten democracy. For instance, a political party could, misleadingly, present itself as a different one-issue party to different individuals. And data collection for microtargeting raises privacy concerns. We sketch possibilities for policymakers if they seek to regulate online political microtargeting. We discuss which measures would be possible, while complying with the right to freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.