Decomposing identification gains and evaluating instrument identification power for partially identified average treatment effects

Abstract.: In this article, we synthesize and review existing results on the roles of instrumental variables (IVs) in average treatment effect (ATE) partial identification analysis. We provide a novel decomposition of identification gains in ATE bounds and offer insights for understanding the complex role of IVs in conjunction with model features and covariates. An empirical example of childbearing and women’s labor supply, with two IVs of ‘twins’ and ‘same-sex siblings’, demonstrates that ‘twins’ has significantly greater identification power than ‘same-sex siblings’, and the identification power of both IVs is heterogeneous across covariates. Our analysis can also be useful in IV selection in future program experiment designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Econometric Reviews
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2025.2460540
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decomposing identification gains and evaluating instrument identification power for partially identified average treatment effects

Xueyan Zhao, D. S. Poskitt, David T. Frazier, Lina Zhang
Econometric Reviews
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Decomposing identification gains and evaluating instrument identification power for partially identified average treatment effects

Xueyan Zhao, D. S. Poskitt, David T. Frazier, Lina Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract.: In this article, we synthesize and review existing results on the roles of instrumental variables (IVs) in average treatment effect (ATE) partial identification analysis. We provide a novel decomposition of identification gains in ATE bounds and offer insights for understanding the complex role of IVs in conjunction with model features and covariates. An empirical example of childbearing and women’s labor supply, with two IVs of ‘twins’ and ‘same-sex siblings’, demonstrates that ‘twins’ has significantly greater identification power than ‘same-sex siblings’, and the identification power of both IVs is heterogeneous across covariates. Our analysis can also be useful in IV selection in future program experiment designs.

Econometric ReviewsVol. 44(7)
Tinbergen Institute (NL), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Australian Research Council, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.