The “Missing Rich” in Household Surveys: Causes and Correction Approaches

Inequality measures based on household surveys may be biased because they fail to capture the upper tail of the income distribution properly. The "missing rich" problem stems from sampling errors, item and unit nonresponse, underreporting of income, and data preprocessing techniques like top coding. This paper reviews salient approaches to address the underrepresentation of the rich in household surveys. Approaches are classified based on information sources and method. In terms of information sources, the distinction is between within-survey data and survey data combined with external sources (e.g., tax records). In terms of methods, we identify three categories: replacing, reweighting, and combined reweighting and replacing. We show that income inequality levels and trends are sensitive to the correction approach. This paper is a companion piece to the chapter of the same name and includes all the appendices that could not be incorporated into the chapter due to space limitations. (Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality Working Paper)

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/97ng6_v1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Missing Rich” in Household Surveys: Causes and Correction Approaches

Andrea Vigorito, Nora Claudia Lustig
2 citations
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

The “Missing Rich” in Household Surveys: Causes and Correction Approaches

Andrea Vigorito, Nora Claudia Lustig
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Inequality measures based on household surveys may be biased because they fail to capture the upper tail of the income distribution properly. The "missing rich" problem stems from sampling errors, item and unit nonresponse, underreporting of income, and data preprocessing techniques like top coding. This paper reviews salient approaches to address the underrepresentation of the rich in household surveys. Approaches are classified based on information sources and method. In terms of information sources, the distinction is between within-survey data and survey data combined with external sources (e.g., tax records). In terms of methods, we identify three categories: replacing, reweighting, and combined reweighting and replacing. We show that income inequality levels and trends are sensitive to the correction approach. This paper is a companion piece to the chapter of the same name and includes all the appendices that could not be incorporated into the chapter due to space limitations. (Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality Working Paper)

No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.