A certified unconditional upper bound Λ ≤ 0.1965 for the de Bruijn–Newman constant

Let Λ denote the de Bruijn–Newman constant. The recorded state of the art is Λ ≤ 0.2: when Platt–Trudgian verified the Riemann hypothesis to the exact height T = 3,000,175,332,800 (≈ 3.0002×10^12), it was noted at once that this improves the Polymath15 bound Λ ≤ 0.22 to Λ ≤ 0.2. A sharper, essentially 0.197-class computation at the same barrier site was publicly reported in a May 2020 comment on T. Tao's blog by Rudolph [Dwars] — uncertified, unrefereed, and never independently verified. This paper supplies the certified, theorem-grade version of that bound and goes beyond it. Subject to the published Polymath15 criterion and the published Platt–Trudgian verification, the attached certificates prove, unconditionally, Λ ≤ 0.1965 = 1965/10000 exactly, a certified improvement below the recorded Λ ≤ 0.2 and below the uncertified 0.1972624050 sighting of 2020, with every numerical ingredient backed by interval-arithmetic certificates (explicit ball enclosures, exact-rational endpoint comparisons, exit-0 standalone verifiers) and every theorem-grade claim verified on two mechanically independent code lines sharing zero code. The route to 0.1965 runs through a certified Euler-3 mollifier bound, certifiably beyond the reach of the Euler-2-class mollifier underlying the 2020 computation; its assembly binds a certified Euler-3 selection chain, gap-free finite sweeps, a box-uniform tail bound, a three-stage normalization-conversion lemma chain, the y-quantifier transfer, and the site bookkeeping lemmas, with an independent second-line sign-off on the assembled statement. The same certificate chain certifies the intermediate record Λ ≤ 0.197 and the 2020 comment's exact row, Λ ≤ 0.197262405. Beyond the bound itself we contribute: certified mollifier results, including the first quantitative saturation map of the finite-Euler-product mollifier family at this site (the family provably runs out of cheap depth); the verification methodology, which addresses the cheap-re-verifiability question raised in the 2020 thread and catches a class of silent rendering defects — three of which we document, with resolutions, in the committed Polymath15 artifacts; and a certified negative/feasibility map for the next rung (where the Euler-2 mollifier provably dies, an exact certified costing of the Λ ≤ 0.19 wall at ≥ 3.4881× the entire Platt–Trudgian computation, a measured GPU pricing of that wall, and a measured kill of the contour-mode verification route). Results currently resting on a single certified verification line are explicitly marked. Contact/updates: Mosaic Intelligence (@111111, https://x.com/111111)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20724169
Citations
73
Primary Topic
Analytic Number Theory Research
Type
article

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A certified unconditional upper bound Λ ≤ 0.1965 for the de Bruijn–Newman constant

David J. Platt
73 citations
Open MIND
Analytic Number Theory Research
article

A certified unconditional upper bound Λ ≤ 0.1965 for the de Bruijn–Newman constant

David J. Platt
article en
73 citations

Abstract

Let Λ denote the de Bruijn–Newman constant. The recorded state of the art is Λ ≤ 0.2: when Platt–Trudgian verified the Riemann hypothesis to the exact height T = 3,000,175,332,800 (≈ 3.0002×10^12), it was noted at once that this improves the Polymath15 bound Λ ≤ 0.22 to Λ ≤ 0.2. A sharper, essentially 0.197-class computation at the same barrier site was publicly reported in a May 2020 comment on T. Tao's blog by Rudolph [Dwars] — uncertified, unrefereed, and never independently verified. This paper supplies the certified, theorem-grade version of that bound and goes beyond it. Subject to the published Polymath15 criterion and the published Platt–Trudgian verification, the attached certificates prove, unconditionally, Λ ≤ 0.1965 = 1965/10000 exactly, a certified improvement below the recorded Λ ≤ 0.2 and below the uncertified 0.1972624050 sighting of 2020, with every numerical ingredient backed by interval-arithmetic certificates (explicit ball enclosures, exact-rational endpoint comparisons, exit-0 standalone verifiers) and every theorem-grade claim verified on two mechanically independent code lines sharing zero code. The route to 0.1965 runs through a certified Euler-3 mollifier bound, certifiably beyond the reach of the Euler-2-class mollifier underlying the 2020 computation; its assembly binds a certified Euler-3 selection chain, gap-free finite sweeps, a box-uniform tail bound, a three-stage normalization-conversion lemma chain, the y-quantifier transfer, and the site bookkeeping lemmas, with an independent second-line sign-off on the assembled statement. The same certificate chain certifies the intermediate record Λ ≤ 0.197 and the 2020 comment's exact row, Λ ≤ 0.197262405. Beyond the bound itself we contribute: certified mollifier results, including the first quantitative saturation map of the finite-Euler-product mollifier family at this site (the family provably runs out of cheap depth); the verification methodology, which addresses the cheap-re-verifiability question raised in the 2020 thread and catches a class of silent rendering defects — three of which we document, with resolutions, in the committed Polymath15 artifacts; and a certified negative/feasibility map for the next rung (where the Euler-2 mollifier provably dies, an exact certified costing of the Λ ≤ 0.19 wall at ≥ 3.4881× the entire Platt–Trudgian computation, a measured GPU pricing of that wall, and a measured kill of the contour-mode verification route). Results currently resting on a single certified verification line are explicitly marked. Contact/updates: Mosaic Intelligence (@111111, https://x.com/111111)

Open MIND
University of Bristol (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Analytic Number Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.