Participatory budgeting with project groups

We study a generalization of the standard approval-based model of participatory budgeting (PB), in which voters are providing approval ballots over a set of predefined projects and—in addition to a global budget limit, there are several groupings of the projects, each group with its own budget limit. We study the computational complexity of identifying project bundles that maximize voter satisfaction while respecting all budget limits. We show that the problem is generally intractable and describe efficient exact algorithms for several special cases, including instances with only few groups and instances where the group structure is close to be hierarchical, as well as efficient approximation algorithms. Our results could allow, e.g., municipalities to hold richer PB processes that are thematically and geographically inclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2025.103702
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory budgeting with project groups

Krzysztof Sornat, Nimrod Talmon, Pallavi Jain, Meirav Zehavi
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Participatory budgeting with project groups

Krzysztof Sornat, Nimrod Talmon, Pallavi Jain, Meirav Zehavi
article en

Abstract

We study a generalization of the standard approval-based model of participatory budgeting (PB), in which voters are providing approval ballots over a set of predefined projects and—in addition to a global budget limit, there are several groupings of the projects, each group with its own budget limit. We study the computational complexity of identifying project bundles that maximize voter satisfaction while respecting all budget limits. We show that the problem is generally intractable and describe efficient exact algorithms for several special cases, including instances with only few groups and instances where the group structure is close to be hierarchical, as well as efficient approximation algorithms. Our results could allow, e.g., municipalities to hold richer PB processes that are thematically and geographically inclusive.

Journal of Computer and System SciencesVol. 156
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Israel Science Foundation, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Research Council, Science and Engineering Research Board, H2020 European Research Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Participatory budgeting with project groups — Krzysztof Sornat, Nimrod Talmon, et al. · Journal of Computer and System Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS