Long Live the King: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's King's Bench Powers Rightfully Crown It as King of the Commonwealth's Judiciary

This Comment argues that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s King’s Bench powers remain an essential tool for supervising the Commonwealth’s judiciary and addressing extraordinary threats to the administration of justice. Examining the historical origins and modern use of King’s Bench jurisdiction, the Comment contends that the court has exercised the power sparingly and appropriately in cases involving judicial misconduct, systemic failures, and matters of exceptional public importance. It concludes that King’s Bench jurisdiction should be preserved as a flexible mechanism that enables the court to fulfill its constitutional oversight responsibilities when ordinary procedures are inadequate.[This abstract was written by Microsoft Copilot, a generative artificial intelligence.]

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bypmh_v1
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Long Live the King: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's King's Bench Powers Rightfully Crown It as King of the Commonwealth's Judiciary

Michael J. Schwab
American Constitutional Law and Politics
preprint

Long Live the King: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's King's Bench Powers Rightfully Crown It as King of the Commonwealth's Judiciary

Michael J. Schwab
preprint en

Abstract

This Comment argues that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s King’s Bench powers remain an essential tool for supervising the Commonwealth’s judiciary and addressing extraordinary threats to the administration of justice. Examining the historical origins and modern use of King’s Bench jurisdiction, the Comment contends that the court has exercised the power sparingly and appropriately in cases involving judicial misconduct, systemic failures, and matters of exceptional public importance. It concludes that King’s Bench jurisdiction should be preserved as a flexible mechanism that enables the court to fulfill its constitutional oversight responsibilities when ordinary procedures are inadequate.[This abstract was written by Microsoft Copilot, a generative artificial intelligence.]

Vol. 65(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.