The politics of interwar chemistry Neutrality and nationalism in the rhetoric and actions of internationalist chemists

The First World War challenged internationalist ideals in chemistry, as nations mobilized researchers for military purposes. In different ways, chemists from various nations reconstructed international networks in the interwar period. A transnational comparison shows that German (Fritz Haber) and British (Frederick Donnan) chemistry coordinated their international efforts easily with state and industry, as the relations had intensified during the war. Chemists from Sweden (Svante Arrhenius) and the Netherlands (Ernst Cohen) turned to the cultural and epistemic meaning of neutrality to justify their internationalism at home and abroad. The comparative analysis emphasizes national histories in understanding the politics of international science.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/vk5je_v1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of interwar chemistry Neutrality and nationalism in the rhetoric and actions of internationalist chemists

Jorrit P. Smit
4 citations
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
article

The politics of interwar chemistry Neutrality and nationalism in the rhetoric and actions of internationalist chemists

Jorrit P. Smit
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The First World War challenged internationalist ideals in chemistry, as nations mobilized researchers for military purposes. In different ways, chemists from various nations reconstructed international networks in the interwar period. A transnational comparison shows that German (Fritz Haber) and British (Frederick Donnan) chemistry coordinated their international efforts easily with state and industry, as the relations had intensified during the war. Chemists from Sweden (Svante Arrhenius) and the Netherlands (Ernst Cohen) turned to the cultural and epistemic meaning of neutrality to justify their internationalism at home and abroad. The comparative analysis emphasizes national histories in understanding the politics of international science.

Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.