Pit backfilling on two continents: Comparison of recent experiences in the Wismut and Flambeau projects

Commitments to backfill acid generating waste rock are becoming a common part of mine closure plans. However, the difficulties associated with translating such commitments into practice are not commonly recognized. This paper compares recent experiences with full-scale backfilling operations at two mines, one in the U.S. and one in Germany. At Wismuts’ uranium mining operations in the former East Germany Ronneburg mining district, waste rock was placed in fourteen piles. Acid generating rock was mixed with neutral rock, resulting in various combinations of acid generation, heavy metal release, and radon exhalation. The need to control further acid generation and prevent formation of a contaminated pit lake led to the decision to relocate waste rock to fill the Lichtenberg open pit. The relocation program is designed to place the waste rock with the highest potential for acid generation below the future water table, and to cover the remaining acid generating rock with a layer of net acid consuming sulfidic rock, which will act as an oxygen consuming layer. The relocation program therefore requires in-field identification of different classes of waste rock and an iterative planning and control program. In contrast, at Flambeau Mining Co.’s copper/gold/silver operation near Ladysmith, Wisconsin, waste rock was separated into non-acid generating (Type I) and potentially acid generating (Type II) waste rock during operations. The objective of the reclamation plan was to backfill the waste rock in reverse order in which it was mined. After reflooding, all of the potentially acid generating rock would be below the water table. The key problem was to quantify the acidity stored in the waste rock, and to add appropriate amounts of alkali. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between the two programs with respect to the testing undertaken to support the backfill design, methods used for material identification, classification, control of alkali addition rates, and long and short term planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003761785-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mining Techniques and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pit backfilling on two continents: Comparison of recent experiences in the Wismut and Flambeau projects

R Dachel, John R Chapman, Daryl Hockley, J Sevick et al.
2 citations
Mining Techniques and Economics
article

Pit backfilling on two continents: Comparison of recent experiences in the Wismut and Flambeau projects

R Dachel, John R Chapman, Daryl Hockley, J Sevick, Micheal Paul
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Commitments to backfill acid generating waste rock are becoming a common part of mine closure plans. However, the difficulties associated with translating such commitments into practice are not commonly recognized. This paper compares recent experiences with full-scale backfilling operations at two mines, one in the U.S. and one in Germany. At Wismuts’ uranium mining operations in the former East Germany Ronneburg mining district, waste rock was placed in fourteen piles. Acid generating rock was mixed with neutral rock, resulting in various combinations of acid generation, heavy metal release, and radon exhalation. The need to control further acid generation and prevent formation of a contaminated pit lake led to the decision to relocate waste rock to fill the Lichtenberg open pit. The relocation program is designed to place the waste rock with the highest potential for acid generation below the future water table, and to cover the remaining acid generating rock with a layer of net acid consuming sulfidic rock, which will act as an oxygen consuming layer. The relocation program therefore requires in-field identification of different classes of waste rock and an iterative planning and control program. In contrast, at Flambeau Mining Co.’s copper/gold/silver operation near Ladysmith, Wisconsin, waste rock was separated into non-acid generating (Type I) and potentially acid generating (Type II) waste rock during operations. The objective of the reclamation plan was to backfill the waste rock in reverse order in which it was mined. After reflooding, all of the potentially acid generating rock would be below the water table. The key problem was to quantify the acidity stored in the waste rock, and to add appropriate amounts of alkali. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between the two programs with respect to the testing undertaken to support the backfill design, methods used for material identification, classification, control of alkali addition rates, and long and short term planning.

Petrel Robertson Consulting (Canada) (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Mining Techniques and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pit backfilling on two continents: Comparison of recent experiences in the Wismut and Flambeau projects — R Dachel, John R Chapman, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS