Environmental Disaster and Mental Health: Coping and Depression among Survivors of Multiple Disasters

Although previous studies have focused on various coping strategies and their relationships with mental health, limited attention has been given to exploring coping and depression among residents living in disaster-prone communities. The purpose of this study was to examine how various coping styles are related to depressive symptoms among residents of the Mississippi Gulf Coast who have survived multiple disasters. Specifically, this study aimed to analyze three methods of coping–positive reframe coping, help-seeking coping, and substance use coping–and their relationships to depressive symptoms. Because this geographic area is prone to a higher rate of disasters, it is imperative to examine the manner in which residents are coping with these stressful events. This analysis included a randomly selected sampling of 216 Mississippi Gulf Coast respondents who lived in the Gulf Coast area during both Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that the coping variables and the demographic variables collectively explained 43 percent of the variance in depressive symptoms. For this sample, positive reframe coping was negatively associated with depressive symptoms, whereas substance use coping was positively associated and help-seeking coping was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Implications for these findings for social work practice at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels will be discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Best practices in mental health
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70256/928610xdrzdk
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Disaster and Mental Health: Coping and Depression among Survivors of Multiple Disasters

Morgan W. Bradwell, Joohee Lee
1 citations
Best practices in mental health
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Environmental Disaster and Mental Health: Coping and Depression among Survivors of Multiple Disasters

Morgan W. Bradwell, Joohee Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although previous studies have focused on various coping strategies and their relationships with mental health, limited attention has been given to exploring coping and depression among residents living in disaster-prone communities. The purpose of this study was to examine how various coping styles are related to depressive symptoms among residents of the Mississippi Gulf Coast who have survived multiple disasters. Specifically, this study aimed to analyze three methods of coping–positive reframe coping, help-seeking coping, and substance use coping–and their relationships to depressive symptoms. Because this geographic area is prone to a higher rate of disasters, it is imperative to examine the manner in which residents are coping with these stressful events. This analysis included a randomly selected sampling of 216 Mississippi Gulf Coast respondents who lived in the Gulf Coast area during both Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that the coping variables and the demographic variables collectively explained 43 percent of the variance in depressive symptoms. For this sample, positive reframe coping was negatively associated with depressive symptoms, whereas substance use coping was positively associated and help-seeking coping was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Implications for these findings for social work practice at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels will be discussed.

Best practices in mental healthVol. 20(2)
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.