Ductility of steel connections in concentrically braced frames under seismic forces

Steel Concentrically Braced Frames (CBFs) designed for seismic forces in accordance with current Australian practice are assumed to possess a level of ductility and overstrength sufficient to justify a response reduction factor (R) of five. This assumption implies that some earthquake energy will be dissipated through inelastic behaviour, specifically the buckling of the bracing members. However, the Australian steel code AS4100 does not require that the connections in the majority of CBFs be designed for the actual strength of the bracing members. Instead, the bracing member design load is used. A summary is presented of work currently under way to test the actual strength and ductility capacity of connections in a CBF designed for conditions typical of Melbourne. The results of a preliminary Finite Element Analysis (FEA) predict that the strength of the selected critical connection is less than the theoretical buckling capacity of the brace member. The series of practical investigations outlined is expected to confirm these FEA results.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003761730-57
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ductility of steel connections in concentrically braced frames under seismic forces

H Goldsworthy, DS Mansell, John L. Wilson, D.G. Wallace
4 links
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Ductility of steel connections in concentrically braced frames under seismic forces

H Goldsworthy, DS Mansell, John L. Wilson, D.G. Wallace
article en

Abstract

Steel Concentrically Braced Frames (CBFs) designed for seismic forces in accordance with current Australian practice are assumed to possess a level of ductility and overstrength sufficient to justify a response reduction factor (R) of five. This assumption implies that some earthquake energy will be dissipated through inelastic behaviour, specifically the buckling of the bracing members. However, the Australian steel code AS4100 does not require that the connections in the majority of CBFs be designed for the actual strength of the bracing members. Instead, the bracing member design load is used. A summary is presented of work currently under way to test the actual strength and ductility capacity of connections in a CBF designed for conditions typical of Melbourne. The results of a preliminary Finite Element Analysis (FEA) predict that the strength of the selected critical connection is less than the theoretical buckling capacity of the brace member. The series of practical investigations outlined is expected to confirm these FEA results.

Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ductility of steel connections in concentrically braced frames under seismic forces — H Goldsworthy, DS Mansell, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS