Corruption and extremism

This paper shows that corruption generates extremism, but mainly on the opposition side. While corruption hurts all citizens, only voters on the minority side may desire to switch to a more extreme representative when they perceive a more corrupt political system. In our model, campaigning on a corruption scandal against the incumbent gives a higher winningprobability for the opposition politician but simultaneously reduces expected future rents from office. As extremist politicians normally are less likely to win against a moderate opponent, they have a stronger incentive to take a stand against corruption. Given that the side of the political minority has a lower chance of having their representative elected to office, they face a smaller opportunity cost of voting for extremists. Our main result is that minorities are more likely to react to corruption with more extremism. We provide causal evidence for this novel asymmetric prediction from Indonesia and Brazil.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Development Economics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103526
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corruption and extremism

Attila Gáspár, Tommaso Giommoni, Antonio Nicolò, Massimo Morelli
1 citations
Journal of Development Economics
Corruption and Economic Development
4.20
article

Corruption and extremism

Attila Gáspár, Tommaso Giommoni, Antonio Nicolò, Massimo Morelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper shows that corruption generates extremism, but mainly on the opposition side. While corruption hurts all citizens, only voters on the minority side may desire to switch to a more extreme representative when they perceive a more corrupt political system. In our model, campaigning on a corruption scandal against the incumbent gives a higher winningprobability for the opposition politician but simultaneously reduces expected future rents from office. As extremist politicians normally are less likely to win against a moderate opponent, they have a stronger incentive to take a stand against corruption. Given that the side of the political minority has a lower chance of having their representative elected to office, they face a smaller opportunity cost of voting for extremists. Our main result is that minorities are more likely to react to corruption with more extremism. We provide causal evidence for this novel asymmetric prediction from Indonesia and Brazil.

Journal of Development EconomicsVol. 177
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Corruption and Economic Development
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corruption and extremism — Attila Gáspár, Tommaso Giommoni, et al. · Journal of Development Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS