Asenapine in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Clinical Trial Design and Rationale

Although the positive symptoms of schizophrenia are more likely than the negative symptoms to result in a patient's hospitalization, positive symptoms tend to respond more completely to antipsychotic drugs.When positive symptoms are controlled, residual negative symptoms may remain. If these negative symptoms persist, they can have a considerable impact on a patient's ability to function in society. Current therapies have only a limited effect on negative symptoms. Consequently, broad-spectrum agents that effectively treat both positive and negative symptoms are needed. One obstacle to the regulatory approval of an agent for treating negative symptoms is the difficulty of designing a trial to demonstrate efficacy for these symptoms. Agreeing on a definition of negative symptoms, establishing patient inclusion criteria, and determining how to account for confounding factors represent only a few of the challenges to study design. How these challenges can be met is illustrated in the design of a series of clinical trials to assess the efficacy of asenapine, a psychopharmacologic agent being developed for the treatment of schizophrenia and, in particular, the treatment of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. These trials, the protocols for which are described in this paper, will not only determine the efficacy of asenapine but will add to our knowledge of patients with predominant, persistent negative symptoms, an understudied and inadequately treated patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64719/pb.4120
Citations
28
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asenapine in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Clinical Trial Design and Rationale

Larry Alphs, John Panagides, Scott Lancaster
28 citations
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Asenapine in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Clinical Trial Design and Rationale

Larry Alphs, John Panagides, Scott Lancaster
article en
28 citations

Abstract

Although the positive symptoms of schizophrenia are more likely than the negative symptoms to result in a patient's hospitalization, positive symptoms tend to respond more completely to antipsychotic drugs.When positive symptoms are controlled, residual negative symptoms may remain. If these negative symptoms persist, they can have a considerable impact on a patient's ability to function in society. Current therapies have only a limited effect on negative symptoms. Consequently, broad-spectrum agents that effectively treat both positive and negative symptoms are needed. One obstacle to the regulatory approval of an agent for treating negative symptoms is the difficulty of designing a trial to demonstrate efficacy for these symptoms. Agreeing on a definition of negative symptoms, establishing patient inclusion criteria, and determining how to account for confounding factors represent only a few of the challenges to study design. How these challenges can be met is illustrated in the design of a series of clinical trials to assess the efficacy of asenapine, a psychopharmacologic agent being developed for the treatment of schizophrenia and, in particular, the treatment of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. These trials, the protocols for which are described in this paper, will not only determine the efficacy of asenapine but will add to our knowledge of patients with predominant, persistent negative symptoms, an understudied and inadequately treated patient population.

Psychopharmacology BulletinVol. 40(2)
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.