Has fiscal expansion inflated house prices in China? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model

We evaluate the impacts of government spending and government investment on the house price dynamics in China during its Great Housing Boom. Government spending is defined as public expenditures on non-productive public goods and services, while government investment is defined as expenditures on productive public capital. By estimating a DSGE model which allows for potential non-separability between government spending and housing in household utility, and a policy feedback rule governing government investment, we find: (a) government spending exhibits a crowding-out effect on housing consumption, though empirically it does not affect the housing price much; (b) government investment, which exhibits a strong wealth effect on household income and then the demand for houses, affects the housing price positively and substantially; (c) both government spending and government investment are effective instruments for stimulating output, but given that government investment can inflate house prices unnecessarily, policy makers who aim to stimulate the economy without destabilising the housing market would be better off utilising government spending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103541
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Has fiscal expansion inflated house prices in China? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model

Chunping Liu, Zhirong Ou
4 citations
International Review of Economics & Finance
Housing Market and Economics
2.26
article

Has fiscal expansion inflated house prices in China? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model

Chunping Liu, Zhirong Ou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We evaluate the impacts of government spending and government investment on the house price dynamics in China during its Great Housing Boom. Government spending is defined as public expenditures on non-productive public goods and services, while government investment is defined as expenditures on productive public capital. By estimating a DSGE model which allows for potential non-separability between government spending and housing in household utility, and a policy feedback rule governing government investment, we find: (a) government spending exhibits a crowding-out effect on housing consumption, though empirically it does not affect the housing price much; (b) government investment, which exhibits a strong wealth effect on household income and then the demand for houses, affects the housing price positively and substantially; (c) both government spending and government investment are effective instruments for stimulating output, but given that government investment can inflate house prices unnecessarily, policy makers who aim to stimulate the economy without destabilising the housing market would be better off utilising government spending.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 96
Nottingham Trent University (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Cardiff University, Guizhou University, Trường Đại học Kinh tế - Luật, Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Housing Market and Economics
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.