Tax Progressivity, Economic Booms and Trickle-Up Economics

We propose a method to decompose changes in the tax structure into orthogonal components measuring the level and progressivity of taxes. The level shock is similar to tax shocks found in the empirical literature--increasing the tax level is contractionary. On the other hand, an increase in tax progressivity is expansionary. When tax progressivity increases, the bottom of the income distribution experiences an increase in disposable income. Agents at the low end of the income distribution who have high marginal propensity to consume offset the decrease in consumption by the savers at the high end of the income distribution. In the medium term, the economic expansion benefits those at the top of the income distribution: Capital gains they experience from the boom offset income losses from the increase in tax progressivity. The net result is that an increase in progressivity leads to an increase in income inequality, contrary to what conventional wisdom might suggest. We interpret these results as evidence in favor of trickle up, not trickle down, economics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2514
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tax Progressivity, Economic Booms and Trickle-Up Economics

Michael T. Owyang, Nora Traum, Christopher Otrok, Laura E. Jackson
1 citations
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
article

Tax Progressivity, Economic Booms and Trickle-Up Economics

Michael T. Owyang, Nora Traum, Christopher Otrok, Laura E. Jackson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We propose a method to decompose changes in the tax structure into orthogonal components measuring the level and progressivity of taxes. The level shock is similar to tax shocks found in the empirical literature--increasing the tax level is contractionary. On the other hand, an increase in tax progressivity is expansionary. When tax progressivity increases, the bottom of the income distribution experiences an increase in disposable income. Agents at the low end of the income distribution who have high marginal propensity to consume offset the decrease in consumption by the savers at the high end of the income distribution. In the medium term, the economic expansion benefits those at the top of the income distribution: Capital gains they experience from the boom offset income losses from the increase in tax progressivity. The net result is that an increase in progressivity leads to an increase in income inequality, contrary to what conventional wisdom might suggest. We interpret these results as evidence in favor of trickle up, not trickle down, economics.

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working PapersVol. 2025(2514)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tax Progressivity, Economic Booms and Trickle-Up Economics — Michael T. Owyang, Nora Traum, et al. · Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS