On the road to social mobility? Affirmative action and major choice

Students from disadvantaged backgrounds are often underrepresented in prestigious and high-paying fields of study, such as STEM. While affirmative action (AA) policies have been shown to increase the representation of minority students in selective universities, they may also affect students’ choice of majors, with potential implications for social mobility. We exploit a policy implemented by a selective Brazilian university that expanded the range of majors available to lower-SES applicants, using it as a natural experiment. We find that the policy increased targeted students’ applications to, and acceptance into, prestigious STEM majors, and attenuated the influence of socioeconomic background on major choices. • Affirmative action increased public-school students’ applications to STEM. • Policy boosted admission of disadvantaged students into selective top-five majors. • Major-choice gap by socioeconomic background narrowed significantly post-policy. • Higher-ability students were most responsive to affirmative action incentives. • Policy reduced the parental income gradient in access to prestigious majors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labour Economics
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2025.102821
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the road to social mobility? Affirmative action and major choice

Fernanda Estevan, Thomas Gall, Louis‐Philippe Morin
8 citations
Labour Economics
Labor Movements and Unions
7.31
article

On the road to social mobility? Affirmative action and major choice

Fernanda Estevan, Thomas Gall, Louis‐Philippe Morin
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Students from disadvantaged backgrounds are often underrepresented in prestigious and high-paying fields of study, such as STEM. While affirmative action (AA) policies have been shown to increase the representation of minority students in selective universities, they may also affect students’ choice of majors, with potential implications for social mobility. We exploit a policy implemented by a selective Brazilian university that expanded the range of majors available to lower-SES applicants, using it as a natural experiment. We find that the policy increased targeted students’ applications to, and acceptance into, prestigious STEM majors, and attenuated the influence of socioeconomic background on major choices. • Affirmative action increased public-school students’ applications to STEM. • Policy boosted admission of disadvantaged students into selective top-five majors. • Major-choice gap by socioeconomic background narrowed significantly post-policy. • Higher-ability students were most responsive to affirmative action incentives. • Policy reduced the parental income gradient in access to prestigious majors.

Labour EconomicsVol. 97
Centro Universitário da Fundação Educacional de Barretos (BR), University of Southampton (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Labor Movements and Unions
7.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.