Using expert-opinions, retro-analyzes and experience feedback to risk-analysis and risk-hierarchization: application to the Lorraine ferriferous basin (France)

The dramatic events noted on the Lorraine iron-ore basin at Auboué and Moutiers in October 1996 and May 1997 recall that “La Nature a horreur du vide”. During the exploitation period of the iron ore, the Operator had undertaken protection procedures by using the “rooms and pillars method”. However, in many cases this method that consists in leaving a network of pillars to support the weight of the overlying grounds, assured only a short-term stability. Thus, the extraction of the ore has certainly an impact on the surface that can appear in various phenomenological forms: progressive such as subsidence, or abrupt such as collapse. These surface observations can cause some irreversible damages to people and constructions. Prevention of risk and protection and information of people lies to the Government when the Operator is defaulting. In this context, the analysis and the hierarchization of the risk are strongly dependent on the management of the complexity due to: the incomplete nature of information available (plans and archives); the state of knowledge on the rupture mechanisms of the mining work and on vulnerability of constructions; and the importance of strategic and space-time aspects. In this paper, we propose a method for risk-analysis and risk-hierarchization, using: the information collected on the various incidents and accidents (retro-analyzes); the individual and collective knowledge of the implied actors (expertise) and the experience feedbacks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003762584-21
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using expert-opinions, retro-analyzes and experience feedback to risk-analysis and risk-hierarchization: application to the Lorraine ferriferous basin (France)

Myriam Mérad, Thierry Verdel, Bernard Roy
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

Using expert-opinions, retro-analyzes and experience feedback to risk-analysis and risk-hierarchization: application to the Lorraine ferriferous basin (France)

Myriam Mérad, Thierry Verdel, Bernard Roy
article en

Abstract

The dramatic events noted on the Lorraine iron-ore basin at Auboué and Moutiers in October 1996 and May 1997 recall that “La Nature a horreur du vide”. During the exploitation period of the iron ore, the Operator had undertaken protection procedures by using the “rooms and pillars method”. However, in many cases this method that consists in leaving a network of pillars to support the weight of the overlying grounds, assured only a short-term stability. Thus, the extraction of the ore has certainly an impact on the surface that can appear in various phenomenological forms: progressive such as subsidence, or abrupt such as collapse. These surface observations can cause some irreversible damages to people and constructions. Prevention of risk and protection and information of people lies to the Government when the Operator is defaulting. In this context, the analysis and the hierarchization of the risk are strongly dependent on the management of the complexity due to: the incomplete nature of information available (plans and archives); the state of knowledge on the rupture mechanisms of the mining work and on vulnerability of constructions; and the importance of strategic and space-time aspects. In this paper, we propose a method for risk-analysis and risk-hierarchization, using: the information collected on the various incidents and accidents (retro-analyzes); the individual and collective knowledge of the implied actors (expertise) and the experience feedbacks.

Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques (FR), Lamsade (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.