When Adaptivity Counts: Hit-Count Inspection with Information-Only Queries

We study a hidden-set problem in which perfect point queries acquire information but earn no reward, while a separate exact-q terminal action earns its hit count. Every instance satisfies V_ad^# <= q V_batch^#; taking the supremum over all depths and finite positive-batch instances at fixed q gives q. For q >= 2 and I >= 1, a staircase has ratio at least q/(1+2q/I) and approaches q as depth and ground size grow. The worst-case additive gap tends to q-1; at depth two, a four-state prior attains the sharp gap q(q-1)/[2(2q-1)]. Under one-hit reward, adaptivity instead collapses: a prior-free pointwise compilation makes all policy classes equal weighted maximum (I+q)-coverage. For hit count, the batch objective is not generally submodular, while a coverage proxy gives a (1-1/e)/q approximation. By contrast, reward-bearing active search admits ratios that grow with feedback-batch size. A two-round q=1 witness exhibits one mechanism by which public reward feedback restores adaptivity in multiday social deduction. Lean checks the finite identities and constructions listed in the verification ledger.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22153724
Citations
72
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Adaptivity Counts: Hit-Count Inspection with Information-Only Queries

72 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Machine Learning and Algorithms
article

When Adaptivity Counts: Hit-Count Inspection with Information-Only Queries

article en
72 citations

Abstract

We study a hidden-set problem in which perfect point queries acquire information but earn no reward, while a separate exact-q terminal action earns its hit count. Every instance satisfies V_ad^# <= q V_batch^#; taking the supremum over all depths and finite positive-batch instances at fixed q gives q. For q >= 2 and I >= 1, a staircase has ratio at least q/(1+2q/I) and approaches q as depth and ground size grow. The worst-case additive gap tends to q-1; at depth two, a four-state prior attains the sharp gap q(q-1)/[2(2q-1)]. Under one-hit reward, adaptivity instead collapses: a prior-free pointwise compilation makes all policy classes equal weighted maximum (I+q)-coverage. For hit count, the batch objective is not generally submodular, while a coverage proxy gives a (1-1/e)/q approximation. By contrast, reward-bearing active search admits ratios that grow with feedback-batch size. A two-round q=1 witness exhibits one mechanism by which public reward feedback restores adaptivity in multiday social deduction. Lean checks the finite identities and constructions listed in the verification ledger.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Machine Learning and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.