Observing Debate in Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking

The objective of this research prove of difference between the limited critical thinking ability and the general critical thinking ability of learners using the methods of debate and discussion with learners who have different learning styles. Using a quasi-experimental design with testing and rating scales, the results showed: (1) there is no difference between the limited critical thinking ability of learn- ers between students who use the method of debate and discussion. There is a difference between the general critical thinking ability of learners between students using the method of debate and those who are using discussion method (2) there is a difference in limited critical thinking ability and the general critical thinking ability between converging learning styles and divergent learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between instructional methods and learning styles on the limited critical thinking ability. The effect of learning methods to the general critical thinking ability is not influenced by the style of learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
jurnal pendidikan humaniora
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17977/2442-3890.1162
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Observing Debate in Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking

Anis Fuad, Dedi Kuswandi, I Wayan Ardhana, Sulton Sulton
2 citations
jurnal pendidikan humaniora
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Observing Debate in Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking

Anis Fuad, Dedi Kuswandi, I Wayan Ardhana, Sulton Sulton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The objective of this research prove of difference between the limited critical thinking ability and the general critical thinking ability of learners using the methods of debate and discussion with learners who have different learning styles. Using a quasi-experimental design with testing and rating scales, the results showed: (1) there is no difference between the limited critical thinking ability of learn- ers between students who use the method of debate and discussion. There is a difference between the general critical thinking ability of learners between students using the method of debate and those who are using discussion method (2) there is a difference in limited critical thinking ability and the general critical thinking ability between converging learning styles and divergent learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between instructional methods and learning styles on the limited critical thinking ability. The effect of learning methods to the general critical thinking ability is not influenced by the style of learning.

jurnal pendidikan humanioraVol. 6(3)
State University of Malang (ID), Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata (ID), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.