Managing the economic dimensions of peace processes: resource wealth, autonomy, and peace in Aceh

Peace processes tend to be dominated by issues deriving from the military and political sphere. This is understandable given a mediator’s immediate concern for ending the fighting, and in the best of cases, preparing the ground for demobilization, as well as for some form of power sharing. Often, mediators also have a military or political background while some are simply so-called “political animals”. This perception of peace processes stands in contrast to the proliferation of scholarly work on the economic characteristics of armed conflict. The paper links this literature to the study and practice of peace processes management. Addressing this gap seems both timely and necessary. Together with studies on Sudan (north-south) and Nepal, this working paper is part of a larger project developed with, and generously funded by, Political Affairs Division IV of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The project analyzes the economic tools in peace processes and identifies their implications for the management of peace processes and post-conflict transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71609/iheid-9wvm-qw36
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing the economic dimensions of peace processes: resource wealth, autonomy, and peace in Aceh

Jana Krause, Achim Wennmann
7 citations
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Natural Resources and Economic Development
article

Managing the economic dimensions of peace processes: resource wealth, autonomy, and peace in Aceh

Jana Krause, Achim Wennmann
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Peace processes tend to be dominated by issues deriving from the military and political sphere. This is understandable given a mediator’s immediate concern for ending the fighting, and in the best of cases, preparing the ground for demobilization, as well as for some form of power sharing. Often, mediators also have a military or political background while some are simply so-called “political animals”. This perception of peace processes stands in contrast to the proliferation of scholarly work on the economic characteristics of armed conflict. The paper links this literature to the study and practice of peace processes management. Addressing this gap seems both timely and necessary. Together with studies on Sudan (north-south) and Nepal, this working paper is part of a larger project developed with, and generously funded by, Political Affairs Division IV of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The project analyzes the economic tools in peace processes and identifies their implications for the management of peace processes and post-conflict transitions.

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.