Quantifying Disruptive Trade Policies

We present an innovative analytical framework that captures key mechanisms of international trade, and we demonstrate its usefulness as a tool for quantitative trade policy analysis. Our application relates to the tariff changes implemented by the United States in 2018 with subsequent retaliations by partner countries, particularly China. The framework is a multi-region multi-sector general equilibrium simulation model of the global economy. Our core contribution is to introduce a new trade structure that includes monopolistic competition among bilateral representative firms (BRF). We compare simulation results from the BRF structure to those from standard trade formulations of perfect and monopolistic competition. We find that the BRF structure leads to substantially larger trade and welfare changes induced by tariff shocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Economic Analysis
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21642/jgea.100101sm1f
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Disruptive Trade Policies

Edward J. Balistreri, Christoph Böhringer, Thomas F. Rutherford
4 citations
Journal of Global Economic Analysis
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Quantifying Disruptive Trade Policies

Edward J. Balistreri, Christoph Böhringer, Thomas F. Rutherford
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We present an innovative analytical framework that captures key mechanisms of international trade, and we demonstrate its usefulness as a tool for quantitative trade policy analysis. Our application relates to the tariff changes implemented by the United States in 2018 with subsequent retaliations by partner countries, particularly China. The framework is a multi-region multi-sector general equilibrium simulation model of the global economy. Our core contribution is to introduce a new trade structure that includes monopolistic competition among bilateral representative firms (BRF). We compare simulation results from the BRF structure to those from standard trade formulations of perfect and monopolistic competition. We find that the BRF structure leads to substantially larger trade and welfare changes induced by tariff shocks.

Journal of Global Economic AnalysisVol. 10(1)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
London School of Economics and Political Science
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.