Communicating Program Eligibility: A Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Field Experiment

We conducted a direct mail field experiment with 4,016,461 individuals to test several key hypotheses about why take-up of Supplemental Security Income among individuals age 65 and above is so low. Communicating likely eligibility in a basic letter generated substantial increases in take-up in relative terms. Adding behaviorally informed statements increased the effectiveness of these communications. Yet, the application rate in our study sample during the full 24-month follow-up period remained no greater than 7 percent. Our results reveal a modest trade-off between increasing applications and the conditional likelihood of award, as well as the award amount. (JEL C93, D12, D83, H55, I38, J14)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20210560
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communicating Program Eligibility: A Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Field Experiment

Nicholas Wilson, John B. Phillips, Elana Safran, Jeffrey Hemmeter
10 citations
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
11.73
article

Communicating Program Eligibility: A Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Field Experiment

Nicholas Wilson, John B. Phillips, Elana Safran, Jeffrey Hemmeter
article en
10 citations

Abstract

We conducted a direct mail field experiment with 4,016,461 individuals to test several key hypotheses about why take-up of Supplemental Security Income among individuals age 65 and above is so low. Communicating likely eligibility in a basic letter generated substantial increases in take-up in relative terms. Adding behaviorally informed statements increased the effectiveness of these communications. Yet, the application rate in our study sample during the full 24-month follow-up period remained no greater than 7 percent. Our results reveal a modest trade-off between increasing applications and the conditional likelihood of award, as well as the award amount. (JEL C93, D12, D83, H55, I38, J14)

American Economic Journal Economic PolicyVol. 17(2)
General Services Administration (US), United States Social Security Administration (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Reed College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.