MODELLING OF RC WALLS WITH DUCTILE DETAILING SUBJECTED TO HIGH AXIAL LOADS

Observations following the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquakes revealed unexpected damage to reinforced concrete walls, characterized by undesirable failure modes such as crushing of concrete and buckling of longitudinal reinforcement in the web and end regions. In an effort to address these failures, a number of changes have been made to the New Zealand Concrete Structures Standard (NZS3101:2006) that will be published in the next amendment. Major changes include an introduction of an axial load limit (P ≤ 0.3Agf’c) and changes to confinement detailing of the wall web and end regions. Four large-scale walls (C10-A30) are currently being tested to assess the effects that variation of these parameters will have on wall response. Prior to commencing experimental testing, blind predictions have been made using nonlinear finite element models developed in VecTor2. The models were calibrated against test results for five walls with similar detailing and loading conditions to C10-A30. The calibrated models successfully matched strength capacity, failure mode (flexural crushing). Drift at failure observed in experiments was simulated with an average accuracy of 5-30%. Using the modelling approach, C10-A30 were predicted to exhibit generally poor performance characterized by low ductility. Specifically, C10 and A10, with axial load ratios of 0.1Agf’c, were predicted to reach 1.6% and 1.8% drift, respectively, before failure with an average ductility of 3. A longer confinement length in A10 compared to C10 had only a minor effect on the deformation capacity. Specimen A20 (axial load of 0.2Agf’c) and A30 (axial load of 0.3Agf’c) were predicted to reach 1.2% drift and 1.05% drift, respectively, with no ductility due to compression-controlled flexural failure resulting from the large axial loads. Failure was characterized by a rapid loss of strength in a brittle compression failure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71846/16-wcee-1157
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MODELLING OF RC WALLS WITH DUCTILE DETAILING SUBJECTED TO HIGH AXIAL LOADS

Kenneth J. Elwood, AS Shegay, Richard Stuart Henry, CJ Motter
1 citations
ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

MODELLING OF RC WALLS WITH DUCTILE DETAILING SUBJECTED TO HIGH AXIAL LOADS

Kenneth J. Elwood, AS Shegay, Richard Stuart Henry, CJ Motter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Observations following the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquakes revealed unexpected damage to reinforced concrete walls, characterized by undesirable failure modes such as crushing of concrete and buckling of longitudinal reinforcement in the web and end regions. In an effort to address these failures, a number of changes have been made to the New Zealand Concrete Structures Standard (NZS3101:2006) that will be published in the next amendment. Major changes include an introduction of an axial load limit (P ≤ 0.3Agf’c) and changes to confinement detailing of the wall web and end regions. Four large-scale walls (C10-A30) are currently being tested to assess the effects that variation of these parameters will have on wall response. Prior to commencing experimental testing, blind predictions have been made using nonlinear finite element models developed in VecTor2. The models were calibrated against test results for five walls with similar detailing and loading conditions to C10-A30. The calibrated models successfully matched strength capacity, failure mode (flexural crushing). Drift at failure observed in experiments was simulated with an average accuracy of 5-30%. Using the modelling approach, C10-A30 were predicted to exhibit generally poor performance characterized by low ductility. Specifically, C10 and A10, with axial load ratios of 0.1Agf’c, were predicted to reach 1.6% and 1.8% drift, respectively, before failure with an average ductility of 3. A longer confinement length in A10 compared to C10 had only a minor effect on the deformation capacity. Specimen A20 (axial load of 0.2Agf’c) and A30 (axial load of 0.3Agf’c) were predicted to reach 1.2% drift and 1.05% drift, respectively, with no ductility due to compression-controlled flexural failure resulting from the large axial loads. Failure was characterized by a rapid loss of strength in a brittle compression failure.

ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MODELLING OF RC WALLS WITH DUCTILE DETAILING SUBJECTED TO HIGH AXIAL LOADS — Kenneth J. Elwood, AS Shegay, et al. · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS