CONFIDENCE-BASED UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT USING LIMITED NUMBERS OF INPUT AND OUTPUT TEST DATA AND VALIDATED SIMULATION MODEL

<title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Accurate reliability assessment requires accurate output distribution. To obtain correct output distribution, a very large number of output physical test data is required, which is prohibitively expensive. Regarding this, simulation-based methods have been developed under the assumption that: (1) accurate input distribution models obtained from large number of input test data; and (2) accurate simulation model (including surrogate model if utilized) that correctly represents physical phenomena. However, in real application, only limited numbers of input test data are available. Thus, input distribution models are uncertain. In addition, the simulation model could be biased due to assumptions and idealizations. Furthermore, only a limited number of physical output test data is available. As a result, a target output distribution to which simulation model can be validated is uncertain and the corresponding reliability is also uncertain. This paper proposes a confidence-based reliability assessment that combines uncertainty due to insufficient input/output test data and biased simulation model. To do that, a hierarchical Bayesian analysis is formulated to obtain uncertainty distribution of reliability. After that, confidence-based reliability is selected at the user-specified target confidence level. It has been numerically demonstrated that the proposed method can estimate reliability of a product that satisfies the user-specified target confidence level.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-3643
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONFIDENCE-BASED UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT USING LIMITED NUMBERS OF INPUT AND OUTPUT TEST DATA AND VALIDATED SIMULATION MODEL

David Gorsich, Hyunkyoo Cho, David Lamb, Kyung K. Choi et al.
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

CONFIDENCE-BASED UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT USING LIMITED NUMBERS OF INPUT AND OUTPUT TEST DATA AND VALIDATED SIMULATION MODEL

David Gorsich, Hyunkyoo Cho, David Lamb, Kyung K. Choi, Nicholas J. Gaul, Min-Yeong Moon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Accurate reliability assessment requires accurate output distribution. To obtain correct output distribution, a very large number of output physical test data is required, which is prohibitively expensive. Regarding this, simulation-based methods have been developed under the assumption that: (1) accurate input distribution models obtained from large number of input test data; and (2) accurate simulation model (including surrogate model if utilized) that correctly represents physical phenomena. However, in real application, only limited numbers of input test data are available. Thus, input distribution models are uncertain. In addition, the simulation model could be biased due to assumptions and idealizations. Furthermore, only a limited number of physical output test data is available. As a result, a target output distribution to which simulation model can be validated is uncertain and the corresponding reliability is also uncertain. This paper proposes a confidence-based reliability assessment that combines uncertainty due to insufficient input/output test data and biased simulation model. To do that, a hierarchical Bayesian analysis is formulated to obtain uncertainty distribution of reliability. After that, confidence-based reliability is selected at the user-specified target confidence level. It has been numerically demonstrated that the proposed method can estimate reliability of a product that satisfies the user-specified target confidence level.</p>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
University of Iowa (US), Ramdo (United States) (US), Aquamarine Power (United Kingdom) (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.