COMPARISON OF EXISTING DAMAGE DETECTION ALGORITHMS ON STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

This paper presents an operational assessment of existing damage detection algorithms for structural health monitoring (SHM) of building structures. This project assumed the typical SHM scenario involving continuous structural vibration recording using accelerometers. This study compared six established stiffness based damage detection algorithms utilising the ASCE benchmark instrumented structure dataset. This will be one of the first studies comparing the effectiveness of current damage detection algorithms using the benchmark data. The analyses indicate that all six considered damage detection algorithms have no difficulty in detecting the existence of the damage. Additionally, the identified stiffnesses using PP, FDD, EFDD methods were the most accurate for identifying the damage severity. The AR-ARX model was the least accuracy in estimating the stiffness amongst the six methods. All six algorithms were sensitive to modelling errors, while ANN and AR-ARX model techniques were sensitive to loading condition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71846/16-wcee-0374
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF EXISTING DAMAGE DETECTION ALGORITHMS ON STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

Quincy Ma, Haozhi Tan, Liam Wotherspoon, Sherif Beskhyroun
ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

COMPARISON OF EXISTING DAMAGE DETECTION ALGORITHMS ON STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

Quincy Ma, Haozhi Tan, Liam Wotherspoon, Sherif Beskhyroun
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an operational assessment of existing damage detection algorithms for structural health monitoring (SHM) of building structures. This project assumed the typical SHM scenario involving continuous structural vibration recording using accelerometers. This study compared six established stiffness based damage detection algorithms utilising the ASCE benchmark instrumented structure dataset. This will be one of the first studies comparing the effectiveness of current damage detection algorithms using the benchmark data. The analyses indicate that all six considered damage detection algorithms have no difficulty in detecting the existence of the damage. Additionally, the identified stiffnesses using PP, FDD, EFDD methods were the most accurate for identifying the damage severity. The AR-ARX model was the least accuracy in estimating the stiffness amongst the six methods. All six algorithms were sensitive to modelling errors, while ANN and AR-ARX model techniques were sensitive to loading condition.

ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.