The role of structural transformation in regional convergence in Japan: 1874–2008

Abstract Japan's regional convergence of productivity levels throughout the twentieth century can be best described as a cumulative process of ‘catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind’. Using a novel dataset spanning 135 years (1874–2008), this study finds support for a crucial role played by structural transformation in convergence. The pace of productivity catch‐up and convergence accelerated in the mid‐1950s with the help of structural transformation, particularly in the period from 1955 to 1965. Structural transformation explains, on average, about 30 per cent of the aggregate productivity growth, and its effect intensified in prefectures with faster movements of labour across sectors and larger sectoral productivity gaps. However, since the early 1970s, its contribution to the convergence was frequently offset by within‐sector productivity growth, in turn thwarting the pace of convergence. These counter‐balancing effects contributed to the diverse pathways of productivity catch‐up at the prefecture level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic History Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70138
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of structural transformation in regional convergence in Japan: 1874–2008

Kyoji Fukao, Saumik Paul
2 citations
The Economic History Review
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

The role of structural transformation in regional convergence in Japan: 1874–2008

Kyoji Fukao, Saumik Paul
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Japan's regional convergence of productivity levels throughout the twentieth century can be best described as a cumulative process of ‘catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind’. Using a novel dataset spanning 135 years (1874–2008), this study finds support for a crucial role played by structural transformation in convergence. The pace of productivity catch‐up and convergence accelerated in the mid‐1950s with the help of structural transformation, particularly in the period from 1955 to 1965. Structural transformation explains, on average, about 30 per cent of the aggregate productivity growth, and its effect intensified in prefectures with faster movements of labour across sectors and larger sectoral productivity gaps. However, since the early 1970s, its contribution to the convergence was frequently offset by within‐sector productivity growth, in turn thwarting the pace of convergence. These counter‐balancing effects contributed to the diverse pathways of productivity catch‐up at the prefecture level.

The Economic History Review
Greater Manchester Police (GB), University of Luxembourg (LU), University of Manchester (GB), Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.