Bayesian efficient coding

The efficient coding hypothesis, which proposes that neurons are optimized to maximize information about the environment, has provided a guiding theoretical framework for sensory and systems neuroscience. More recently, a theory known as the Bayesian Brain hypothesis has focused on the brain's ability to integrate sensory and prior sources of information in order to perform Bayesian inference. Although pieces of a connection between these two hypotheses have appeared in prior work, a general formulation that treats the optimality criterion as an arbitrary functional of the posterior distribution -- and thereby admits both information-based and other objectives within a single framework -- has remained largely implicit. Here we make this formulation explicit, developing a Bayesian theory of efficient coding that defines Bayesian efficient codes in terms of four basic ingredients: (1) a stimulus prior distribution; (2) an encoding model; (3) a capacity constraint, specifying a neural resource limit; and (4) a loss functional, quantifying the desirability or undesirability of various posterior distributions. Classic efficient codes arise as the special case in which the loss functional is the posterior entropy, leading to a code that maximizes mutual information, but alternate loss functionals give solutions that differ dramatically from information-maximizing codes. Within this framework we introduce {\it covtropy}, a novel family of losses defined on posterior distributions and parameterized by a single exponent, and use it to show that decorrelation of sensory inputs -- optimal under classic efficient codes in low-noise settings -- can be disadvantageous for objectives that penalize large errors. We then reanalyze Laughlin's seminal data on contrast coding in the blowfly large monopolar cell, and find that the measured response nonlinearity is better explained by minimizing $L_p$ reconstruction error with $p = 1/2$ than by information maximization, overturning a forty-year-old interpretation. Bayesian efficient coding thus enlarges the family of codes that are optimal under different objectives and provides a more general framework for understanding the design principles of sensory systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014894
Citations
31
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian efficient coding

Jonathan W. Pillow, Il Memming Park
31 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
3.03
article

Bayesian efficient coding

Jonathan W. Pillow, Il Memming Park
article en
31 citations

Abstract

The efficient coding hypothesis, which proposes that neurons are optimized to maximize information about the environment, has provided a guiding theoretical framework for sensory and systems neuroscience. More recently, a theory known as the Bayesian Brain hypothesis has focused on the brain's ability to integrate sensory and prior sources of information in order to perform Bayesian inference. Although pieces of a connection between these two hypotheses have appeared in prior work, a general formulation that treats the optimality criterion as an arbitrary functional of the posterior distribution -- and thereby admits both information-based and other objectives within a single framework -- has remained largely implicit. Here we make this formulation explicit, developing a Bayesian theory of efficient coding that defines Bayesian efficient codes in terms of four basic ingredients: (1) a stimulus prior distribution; (2) an encoding model; (3) a capacity constraint, specifying a neural resource limit; and (4) a loss functional, quantifying the desirability or undesirability of various posterior distributions. Classic efficient codes arise as the special case in which the loss functional is the posterior entropy, leading to a code that maximizes mutual information, but alternate loss functionals give solutions that differ dramatically from information-maximizing codes. Within this framework we introduce {\it covtropy}, a novel family of losses defined on posterior distributions and parameterized by a single exponent, and use it to show that decorrelation of sensory inputs -- optimal under classic efficient codes in low-noise settings -- can be disadvantageous for objectives that penalize large errors. We then reanalyze Laughlin's seminal data on contrast coding in the blowfly large monopolar cell, and find that the measured response nonlinearity is better explained by minimizing $L_p$ reconstruction error with $p = 1/2$ than by information maximization, overturning a forty-year-old interpretation. Bayesian efficient coding thus enlarges the family of codes that are optimal under different objectives and provides a more general framework for understanding the design principles of sensory systems.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 22(11)
Champalimaud Foundation (PT), Princeton University (US), Stony Brook University (US)
National Science Foundation, McKnight Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon