Critical thought in sociolinguistics in France

Abstract The critical dimension was a founding principle of sociolinguistics in France in the 1970s. In this article, I reflect upon the future of this critical thought, forty years on. After outlining the Bourdieusian conception of a critical discipline, I present the development of this thought within French sociolinguistics, dividing it into three stages: the emergence of critical sociolinguistics during the 1970s; the years of its decline (1990–2000); and the current situation, which is characterized by a great amount of scientific diversity. The last forty years have seen the gradual establishment of a scientific community based upon both a sharing of theoretical and methodological principles and upon scientific controversy, including that of the purpose of the discipline. Sociolinguistics in 2017 is faced with the dominance of formal linguistics, and with the intellectual dispersion of the field: what sociolinguistics can offer, in response to this, is its capacity for social implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of the Sociology of Language
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2024-0060
Primary Topic
Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical thought in sociolinguistics in France

Josiane Boutet
International Journal of the Sociology of Language
Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
article

Critical thought in sociolinguistics in France

Josiane Boutet
article en

Abstract

Abstract The critical dimension was a founding principle of sociolinguistics in France in the 1970s. In this article, I reflect upon the future of this critical thought, forty years on. After outlining the Bourdieusian conception of a critical discipline, I present the development of this thought within French sociolinguistics, dividing it into three stages: the emergence of critical sociolinguistics during the 1970s; the years of its decline (1990–2000); and the current situation, which is characterized by a great amount of scientific diversity. The last forty years have seen the gradual establishment of a scientific community based upon both a sharing of theoretical and methodological principles and upon scientific controversy, including that of the purpose of the discipline. Sociolinguistics in 2017 is faced with the dominance of formal linguistics, and with the intellectual dispersion of the field: what sociolinguistics can offer, in response to this, is its capacity for social implementation.

International Journal of the Sociology of LanguageVol. 2025(292)
Sorbonne Université (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.