COMPARING THE THICKNESS OF STERNOCLEIDOMASTOID MUSCLE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH FORWARD HEAD POSTURE AND NORMAL HEAD POSTURE

R. Eshaghi Moghadam11University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Physiotherapy, Tehran, IranBackground: One of the most common postural disorders in today’s societies is the forward head posture (FHP) that is associated with numerous musculoskeletal complications. Considering sternocleidomastoid attachments to the neck, it seems that it would be negatively influenced by such postural deviations.Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the sternocleidomastoid muscle thickness in women with normal head posture (NHP) and FHP.Methods: A case-control study was done in which 18 female students (mean age 24.5±3.3) with FHP and 18 female controls (mean age 23.4±2.5) with NHP were participated. Bilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle thickness were measured in supine position in both groups using ultrasonography. Data analysis was carried out in SPSS V.16.Results: There was no significant difference in thickness of sternocleidomastoid between individuals with FHP and NHP (P>0.05). Also, no significant difference was seen between the two groups in muscle thicknesses on either side of the neck (P> 0.05). In other words, thickness was found to be symmetric on both sides of the neck in both groups.Conclusion(s): According to the results, FHP did not impose any morphological changes on sternocleidomastoid muscle at the fifth cervical vertebral level. Although measurement of the thickness of this muscle in other vertebral levels is recommended for future studies.Implications: although no significant difference was observed in this study between the two groups,it is possible that by measuring the thickness of this muscle in the higher cervical vertebral level due to more changes in the head on the neck at high levels in people with FHP, more differences may be observed, the result this study might be of interest to clinicians and researchers interested in managing postural deviations, particularly those related to FHP.Funding, acknowledgements: this study is financially supported by the university of social welfare and rehabilitation science,Tehran,Iran.Keywords: ultrasonography, sternocleidomastoid, forward head postureTopic: Musculoskeletal: spineDid this work require ethics approval? YesInstitution: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation ScienceCommittee: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation ScienceEthics number: IR.USWR.REC.1394.30All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82161/s1cx-6e24
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARING THE THICKNESS OF STERNOCLEIDOMASTOID MUSCLE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH FORWARD HEAD POSTURE AND NORMAL HEAD POSTURE

Roya Eshaghi Moghadam
3 citations
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

COMPARING THE THICKNESS OF STERNOCLEIDOMASTOID MUSCLE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH FORWARD HEAD POSTURE AND NORMAL HEAD POSTURE

Roya Eshaghi Moghadam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

R. Eshaghi Moghadam11University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Physiotherapy, Tehran, IranBackground: One of the most common postural disorders in today’s societies is the forward head posture (FHP) that is associated with numerous musculoskeletal complications. Considering sternocleidomastoid attachments to the neck, it seems that it would be negatively influenced by such postural deviations.Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the sternocleidomastoid muscle thickness in women with normal head posture (NHP) and FHP.Methods: A case-control study was done in which 18 female students (mean age 24.5±3.3) with FHP and 18 female controls (mean age 23.4±2.5) with NHP were participated. Bilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle thickness were measured in supine position in both groups using ultrasonography. Data analysis was carried out in SPSS V.16.Results: There was no significant difference in thickness of sternocleidomastoid between individuals with FHP and NHP (P>0.05). Also, no significant difference was seen between the two groups in muscle thicknesses on either side of the neck (P> 0.05). In other words, thickness was found to be symmetric on both sides of the neck in both groups.Conclusion(s): According to the results, FHP did not impose any morphological changes on sternocleidomastoid muscle at the fifth cervical vertebral level. Although measurement of the thickness of this muscle in other vertebral levels is recommended for future studies.Implications: although no significant difference was observed in this study between the two groups,it is possible that by measuring the thickness of this muscle in the higher cervical vertebral level due to more changes in the head on the neck at high levels in people with FHP, more differences may be observed, the result this study might be of interest to clinicians and researchers interested in managing postural deviations, particularly those related to FHP.Funding, acknowledgements: this study is financially supported by the university of social welfare and rehabilitation science,Tehran,Iran.Keywords: ultrasonography, sternocleidomastoid, forward head postureTopic: Musculoskeletal: spineDid this work require ethics approval? YesInstitution: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation ScienceCommittee: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation ScienceEthics number: IR.USWR.REC.1394.30All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.

DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Vol. 26(145)
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR)
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.