MODELLING OPTIONS FOR BALLAST TRACK DYNAMICS

Accurate modelling of railway ballasted track dynamics is an important issue for a variety of applications such as the assessment of wheel/rail contact force and critical speed of the vehicle. Track design and assessment against safety and stability criteria can now rely on a number of advanced and validated dynamic models. However, there is a large range of different models that can be used to predict ballasted track dynamics. They vary from fast and simple rigid multi-body models as used in commercial Multibody System approach (MBS) vehicle dynamics calculations, to more complex and expensive three-dimensional (3D) Finite Element (FE) models. This paper investigatesthe influence of different modelling options up to 2000 Hz for characterising ballasted track dynamics with the aim of providing guidelines for simplifying the model and summarising the advantages and limitations of each option. Five different models, a two-degrees-of-freedom (2 dof) multi-body track model, 2D FE model, 3D FE models with/without consideration of sleeper flexibility, and a 3D FE track model with homogeneous ballast layer are used to represent the ballasted track as a two-layer support and compared against an analytical solution. Consideration is given to the flexibility of the sleepers, inclusion of ballast density and geometry, element discretization level and FE model length. Equivalent parameters to convert input data from one model to another are summarized

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25144/24195
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MODELLING OPTIONS FOR BALLAST TRACK DYNAMICS

Yann Bezin, David Thompson, Dimitrios Kostovasilis, Jou-Yi Shih
9 citations
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
article

MODELLING OPTIONS FOR BALLAST TRACK DYNAMICS

Yann Bezin, David Thompson, Dimitrios Kostovasilis, Jou-Yi Shih
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Accurate modelling of railway ballasted track dynamics is an important issue for a variety of applications such as the assessment of wheel/rail contact force and critical speed of the vehicle. Track design and assessment against safety and stability criteria can now rely on a number of advanced and validated dynamic models. However, there is a large range of different models that can be used to predict ballasted track dynamics. They vary from fast and simple rigid multi-body models as used in commercial Multibody System approach (MBS) vehicle dynamics calculations, to more complex and expensive three-dimensional (3D) Finite Element (FE) models. This paper investigatesthe influence of different modelling options up to 2000 Hz for characterising ballasted track dynamics with the aim of providing guidelines for simplifying the model and summarising the advantages and limitations of each option. Five different models, a two-degrees-of-freedom (2 dof) multi-body track model, 2D FE model, 3D FE models with/without consideration of sleeper flexibility, and a 3D FE track model with homogeneous ballast layer are used to represent the ballasted track as a two-layer support and compared against an analytical solution. Consideration is given to the flexibility of the sleepers, inclusion of ballast density and geometry, element discretization level and FE model length. Equivalent parameters to convert input data from one model to another are summarized

University of Southampton (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MODELLING OPTIONS FOR BALLAST TRACK DYNAMICS — Yann Bezin, David Thompson, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS