VARIATIONS WITHIN SIMPLE MODELS FOR STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION

The dynamic response of blocks sitting on a half-space is considered. Buildings and other structures placed on or within the ground influence the transmission of seismic waves. Hence, the presence of a building will have an impact on the dynamic response of neighbouring buildings. Furthermore, obstacles such as concrete blocks lead to wave scattering that may be beneficial or unfavourable for the response of a building close to, for example, a railway. To account for this dynamic cross coupling via the soil, a model must be accurate enough to provide the correct overall behaviour of the scattered wave field. However, simplicity is also important when a model should be used for design purposes, especially in the early stages of design and feasibility studies. The paper addresses two models in 2D and 3D based on different methodologies. Results are discussed regarding their capability to quantify vibration reduction when a periodic combination of masses are added on the ground to mitigate waves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25144/23774
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tree Root and Stability Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VARIATIONS WITHIN SIMPLE MODELS FOR STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION

Andrew Peplow, Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen, Paulius Bucinskas
1 citations
Tree Root and Stability Studies
article

VARIATIONS WITHIN SIMPLE MODELS FOR STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION

Andrew Peplow, Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen, Paulius Bucinskas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The dynamic response of blocks sitting on a half-space is considered. Buildings and other structures placed on or within the ground influence the transmission of seismic waves. Hence, the presence of a building will have an impact on the dynamic response of neighbouring buildings. Furthermore, obstacles such as concrete blocks lead to wave scattering that may be beneficial or unfavourable for the response of a building close to, for example, a railway. To account for this dynamic cross coupling via the soil, a model must be accurate enough to provide the correct overall behaviour of the scattered wave field. However, simplicity is also important when a model should be used for design purposes, especially in the early stages of design and feasibility studies. The paper addresses two models in 2D and 3D based on different methodologies. Results are discussed regarding their capability to quantify vibration reduction when a periodic combination of masses are added on the ground to mitigate waves.

Zayed University (AE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Tree Root and Stability Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

VARIATIONS WITHIN SIMPLE MODELS FOR STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION — Andrew Peplow, Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS