CYCLIC PUSHOVER TEST ON AN UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURE RESEAMBLING A TYPICAL DUTCH TERRACED HOUSE

During the last years, induced seismicity in the northern part of the Netherlands increased and the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures became an important issue. As the problem is recent, the current building stock is not designed to withstand earthquakes and national guidelines are under development, but currently not yet legally mandatory. Consequently, the validation of analysis methods, such as numerical models, for the assessment of URM buildings became of importance. In order to provide benchmarks for the validation procedures, an extensive experimental campaign was carried out at Delft University of Technology in 2015. The campaign selected as case study a terraced house typology, which was extensively built in the Netherlands during the period 1960-1980. The focus was on the characterisation of the typology at various levels: material, connection, component and assemblage level. In this paper, the experimental findings related to a cyclic pushover test on an assembled structure resembling a typical Dutch terraced house are presented.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71846/16-wcee-0435
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CYCLIC PUSHOVER TEST ON AN UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURE RESEAMBLING A TYPICAL DUTCH TERRACED HOUSE

H.R. Schipper, Rita Esposito, Francesco Messali, Geert Ravenshorst et al.
11 citations
Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

CYCLIC PUSHOVER TEST ON AN UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURE RESEAMBLING A TYPICAL DUTCH TERRACED HOUSE

H.R. Schipper, Rita Esposito, Francesco Messali, Geert Ravenshorst, Karel Terwel
article en
11 citations

Abstract

During the last years, induced seismicity in the northern part of the Netherlands increased and the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures became an important issue. As the problem is recent, the current building stock is not designed to withstand earthquakes and national guidelines are under development, but currently not yet legally mandatory. Consequently, the validation of analysis methods, such as numerical models, for the assessment of URM buildings became of importance. In order to provide benchmarks for the validation procedures, an extensive experimental campaign was carried out at Delft University of Technology in 2015. The campaign selected as case study a terraced house typology, which was extensively built in the Netherlands during the period 1960-1980. The focus was on the characterisation of the typology at various levels: material, connection, component and assemblage level. In this paper, the experimental findings related to a cyclic pushover test on an assembled structure resembling a typical Dutch terraced house are presented.

Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.