FINITE ELEMENTS VS. EQUIVALENT-FRAME MODELS FOR URM WALLS’ IN-PLANE BEHAVIOUR

As a consequence of the large number of masonry buildings and their important historical value, there is an ongoing effort to investigate their structural behaviour. This has led to a continuous development of new methodologies and techniques applied to masonry structures, including an increasing application of non-linear analyses.\nThe considerable computational effort required by detailed models, e.g. Finite Elements (FE) models, highlighted the need to develop simplified modelling procedures. In this context, the well-known Equivalent Frame Method (EFM) has become very successful. This simplified approach is based on the assumption that the behaviour of the masonry walls is modelled with a system of mono-dimensional beam elements (pier and spandrel panels). The great simplicity of implementation and interpretation of the results contributed to the widespread application of the method in both the scientific field and the professional practise.\nDespite the huge effort devoted to improve the effectiveness of the EFM, its application can be considered really effective only for new or existing regular buildings. For these structures, in fact, the presence of regular configurations and good connection between walls and floors guarantee a “box-like” behaviour under horizontal (e.g. seismic) loads. The “box like” system is a necessary requisite to obtain the in-plane behaviour of the masonry walls well described by EFM.\nThis method is more difficult to apply to existing irregular buildings and, in particular, in the case of old structures in historical centres. In these cases, irregular geometry, the presence of deformable diaphragms and the interaction with other structures in aggregate configurations are critical issues for the reliability of Equivalent-Frame (EF) procedures.\nA comparison between EF and FE models is deemed useful for investigating some of these uncertainties and for exploring the reliability of EF procedures in the case of existing masonry buildings. In [1], a parametric investigation was performed for several types of masonry regular buildings with different geometrical configurations and for walls affected by geometrical irregularities. The effects of the presence of irregularities on EFM accuracy are presented in this paper.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71846/16-wcee-0865
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FINITE ELEMENTS VS. EQUIVALENT-FRAME MODELS FOR URM WALLS’ IN-PLANE BEHAVIOUR

Rossella Siano, Enrico Spacone, Pere Roca, Guido Camata et al.
2 citations
RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

FINITE ELEMENTS VS. EQUIVALENT-FRAME MODELS FOR URM WALLS’ IN-PLANE BEHAVIOUR

Rossella Siano, Enrico Spacone, Pere Roca, Guido Camata, Vincenzo Sepe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As a consequence of the large number of masonry buildings and their important historical value, there is an ongoing effort to investigate their structural behaviour. This has led to a continuous development of new methodologies and techniques applied to masonry structures, including an increasing application of non-linear analyses.\nThe considerable computational effort required by detailed models, e.g. Finite Elements (FE) models, highlighted the need to develop simplified modelling procedures. In this context, the well-known Equivalent Frame Method (EFM) has become very successful. This simplified approach is based on the assumption that the behaviour of the masonry walls is modelled with a system of mono-dimensional beam elements (pier and spandrel panels). The great simplicity of implementation and interpretation of the results contributed to the widespread application of the method in both the scientific field and the professional practise.\nDespite the huge effort devoted to improve the effectiveness of the EFM, its application can be considered really effective only for new or existing regular buildings. For these structures, in fact, the presence of regular configurations and good connection between walls and floors guarantee a “box-like” behaviour under horizontal (e.g. seismic) loads. The “box like” system is a necessary requisite to obtain the in-plane behaviour of the masonry walls well described by EFM.\nThis method is more difficult to apply to existing irregular buildings and, in particular, in the case of old structures in historical centres. In these cases, irregular geometry, the presence of deformable diaphragms and the interaction with other structures in aggregate configurations are critical issues for the reliability of Equivalent-Frame (EF) procedures.\nA comparison between EF and FE models is deemed useful for investigating some of these uncertainties and for exploring the reliability of EF procedures in the case of existing masonry buildings. In [1], a parametric investigation was performed for several types of masonry regular buildings with different geometrical configurations and for walls affected by geometrical irregularities. The effects of the presence of irregularities on EFM accuracy are presented in this paper.

RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.