Income Inequality Decomposition, Russia 1992-2002: Method and Application

Decomposition methods for income inequality measures, such as the Gini index and the members of the Generalised Entropy family, are widely applied. Most methods decompose income inequality into a between (explained) and a within (unexplained) part, according to two or more population subgroups or income sources. In this article, we use a regression analysis for a lognormal distribution of personal income, modelling both the mean and the variance, decomposing the variance as a measure of income inequality, and apply the method to survey data from Russia spanning the first decade of market transition (1992-2002). For the first years of the transition, only a small part of the income inequality could be explained. Thereafter, between 1996 and 1999, a larger part (up to 40%) could be explained, and ‘winner’ and ‘loser’ categories of the transition could be spotted. Moving to the upper end of the income distribution, the self-employed won from the transition. The unemployed were among the losers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58036/stss.v5i2.161
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Income Inequality Decomposition, Russia 1992-2002: Method and Application

Wilma Jansen, Jos Dessens, Willem‐Jan Verhoeven
3 citations
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Income Inequality Decomposition, Russia 1992-2002: Method and Application

Wilma Jansen, Jos Dessens, Willem‐Jan Verhoeven
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Decomposition methods for income inequality measures, such as the Gini index and the members of the Generalised Entropy family, are widely applied. Most methods decompose income inequality into a between (explained) and a within (unexplained) part, according to two or more population subgroups or income sources. In this article, we use a regression analysis for a lognormal distribution of personal income, modelling both the mean and the variance, decomposing the variance as a measure of income inequality, and apply the method to survey data from Russia spanning the first decade of market transition (1992-2002). For the first years of the transition, only a small part of the income inequality could be explained. Thereafter, between 1996 and 1999, a larger part (up to 40%) could be explained, and ‘winner’ and ‘loser’ categories of the transition could be spotted. Moving to the upper end of the income distribution, the self-employed won from the transition. The unemployed were among the losers.

Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Vol. 5(2)
Utrecht University (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Income Inequality Decomposition, Russia 1992-2002: Method and Application — Wilma Jansen, Jos Dessens, et al. · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS