Intercalibrations of freshwater phytoplankton analyses

Phytoplankton is one of the biological quality elements of the Water Framework Directive of European Union for ecological classification of surface waters included. The reliability and comparability of phytoplankton data is, therefore, essential in assessment of the classification. The recently published standard for phytoplankton analysis based on the Utermohl technique supports stringent demands for comparability of data. We tested the comparability of phytoplankton analyses (Utermohl method) between professional and non-professional analysts. The coefficient of variation was highly variable, 10%-42% for professionals and 8%-57% for non-professionals. Elimination of the error caused by subsampling and the increase in the minimum number of enumerated units decreased the CV especially within professionals. CV was smaller (4%-19%) when samples were counted by one person. In order to minimize the variability caused by differences between subsamples, new methods for comparison testing both for technical enumeration and for species identification should be developed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60910/9mde-zy8h
Citations
45
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercalibrations of freshwater phytoplankton analyses

Kristiina Vuorio, Liisa Lepistö, Anna‐Liisa Holopainen
45 citations
Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
1.00
article

Intercalibrations of freshwater phytoplankton analyses

Kristiina Vuorio, Liisa Lepistö, Anna‐Liisa Holopainen
article en
45 citations

Abstract

Phytoplankton is one of the biological quality elements of the Water Framework Directive of European Union for ecological classification of surface waters included. The reliability and comparability of phytoplankton data is, therefore, essential in assessment of the classification. The recently published standard for phytoplankton analysis based on the Utermohl technique supports stringent demands for comparability of data. We tested the comparability of phytoplankton analyses (Utermohl method) between professional and non-professional analysts. The coefficient of variation was highly variable, 10%-42% for professionals and 8%-57% for non-professionals. Elimination of the error caused by subsampling and the increase in the minimum number of enumerated units decreased the CV especially within professionals. CV was smaller (4%-19%) when samples were counted by one person. In order to minimize the variability caused by differences between subsamples, new methods for comparison testing both for technical enumeration and for species identification should be developed.

Työväentutkimus VuosikirjaVol. 12(5)
Clean water and sanitation, Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.