Different filtration treatments and centrifugation in measuring bacterial production in brackish waters

We tested the filtration method routinely used in pelagic bacterial production measurements against some new, modified and extended methods. We used both 14C-leucine and 3H-thymidine in comparison of two filter types, two modifications of the centrifugation method and the effect of filtering samples first through GF/F-filters (for 14C-leucine only). Tests were run for natural brackish water samples and batch cultures from both pelagic and coastal waters. All seasons were covered in the sampling. The centrifugation methods gave systematically lower results than the filtration methods. Also the use of polycarbonate filters resulted in lower values in measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation compared to the use of cellulose-nitrate filters. Combining the routine cellulose-nitrate filtration with filtering the incubated sample first through a combusted GF/F-filter did not affect the final results. This procedure can therefore be used to get information about the total carbon content of the samples. These results point out that the choice of the post-incubation treatment procedure has a substantial effect on the final bacterial production estimate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60910/3s6m-efp9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different filtration treatments and centrifugation in measuring bacterial production in brackish waters

Liisa Tuominen, Jorma Kuparinen, Susanna Hietanen
1 citations
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Fecal contamination and water quality
article

Different filtration treatments and centrifugation in measuring bacterial production in brackish waters

Liisa Tuominen, Jorma Kuparinen, Susanna Hietanen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We tested the filtration method routinely used in pelagic bacterial production measurements against some new, modified and extended methods. We used both 14C-leucine and 3H-thymidine in comparison of two filter types, two modifications of the centrifugation method and the effect of filtering samples first through GF/F-filters (for 14C-leucine only). Tests were run for natural brackish water samples and batch cultures from both pelagic and coastal waters. All seasons were covered in the sampling. The centrifugation methods gave systematically lower results than the filtration methods. Also the use of polycarbonate filters resulted in lower values in measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation compared to the use of cellulose-nitrate filters. Combining the routine cellulose-nitrate filtration with filtering the incubated sample first through a combusted GF/F-filter did not affect the final results. This procedure can therefore be used to get information about the total carbon content of the samples. These results point out that the choice of the post-incubation treatment procedure has a substantial effect on the final bacterial production estimate.

Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Fecal contamination and water quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.