Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method

Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underestimation correction factors for unstable stratification were 1.03–1.19. Random errors of the flux estimates were most frequently about 20% of the flux value. Fluxes were highest during the summer, declining to near zero during the winter. In summer, fluxes were higher during daytime than at night coinciding with higher turbulence and higher rate of stomatal uptake. Maximum summertime deposition velocities were 6–7 mm s–1. During winter, the diurnal pattern in ozone flux was weak and the deposition velocity was 0.5–1.5 mm s–1. Comparison between eddy covariance and profile flux measurement results generally showed good agreement during daytime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60910/n0p3-4sgt
Citations
43
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method

Markku Kulmala, Toivo Pohja, Timo Vesala, Erkki Siivola et al.
43 citations
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
article

Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method

Markku Kulmala, Toivo Pohja, Timo Vesala, Erkki Siivola, Üllar Rannik, Anni Reissell, P. Keronen, Veijo Hiltunen, Pertti Hari
article en
43 citations

Abstract

Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underestimation correction factors for unstable stratification were 1.03–1.19. Random errors of the flux estimates were most frequently about 20% of the flux value. Fluxes were highest during the summer, declining to near zero during the winter. In summer, fluxes were higher during daytime than at night coinciding with higher turbulence and higher rate of stomatal uptake. Maximum summertime deposition velocities were 6–7 mm s–1. During winter, the diurnal pattern in ozone flux was weak and the deposition velocity was 0.5–1.5 mm s–1. Comparison between eddy covariance and profile flux measurement results generally showed good agreement during daytime.

Boreal Environment Research Journal ArchiveVol. 8(4)
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (SE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.