A typology and ecological classification system for Finnish lakes: applicability of the ECOFRAME scheme

A pan-European typology and ecological classification system for shallow lakes was developed by the EU-funded project ECOFRAME. Here, we tested how the ECOFRAME typology separates Finnish lakes. Without accounting for division by depth, six different ecotypes resulted, one of which included the majority of the lakes. Subdivision of typology appears necessary, especially for organic types. We also collected data on a set of lakes that were extensively studied for their chemical and biological elements and classified the lakes according to the ECOFRAME classification scheme. In general, the achieved ecological quality status for each lake was less favourable than we had expected. Inspection of individual variables used in the classification highlighted some characteristics of Finnish lakes that need to be addressed in the scheme. Macrophyte variables especially need revision to better reflect the state of Finland's humic waters. However, many of the ECOFRAME solutions and guidelines were directly applicable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60910/hpag-kup8
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A typology and ecological classification system for Finnish lakes: applicability of the ECOFRAME scheme

Pasi Ala-Opas, Timo Kairesalo, Suvi Mäkelä, Mirva Nykänen et al.
10 citations
Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
0.50
article

A typology and ecological classification system for Finnish lakes: applicability of the ECOFRAME scheme

Pasi Ala-Opas, Timo Kairesalo, Suvi Mäkelä, Mirva Nykänen, Jaakko Mannio, Eeva Huitu
article en
10 citations

Abstract

A pan-European typology and ecological classification system for shallow lakes was developed by the EU-funded project ECOFRAME. Here, we tested how the ECOFRAME typology separates Finnish lakes. Without accounting for division by depth, six different ecotypes resulted, one of which included the majority of the lakes. Subdivision of typology appears necessary, especially for organic types. We also collected data on a set of lakes that were extensively studied for their chemical and biological elements and classified the lakes according to the ECOFRAME classification scheme. In general, the achieved ecological quality status for each lake was less favourable than we had expected. Inspection of individual variables used in the classification highlighted some characteristics of Finnish lakes that need to be addressed in the scheme. Macrophyte variables especially need revision to better reflect the state of Finland's humic waters. However, many of the ECOFRAME solutions and guidelines were directly applicable.

Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.