Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations.

The combination of the specificity of the antigen-antibody interaction with the sensitivity of fluorescence detection and quantitation yields one of the most widely applicable analytical tools in cell biology. Immunofluorescence (IF) signals can be measured with microscopes or flow cytometers. Choice for either of the two systems depends on the type of preparation (cells, tissues, etc.), on the type of required information (morphology, distribution, quantitation) and on the number and quality of the samples. In IF a choice has to be made for the most appropriate fluorochromes, reagents, equipment and preparative procedure, respectively, the right balance between lightsource, objective, eye pieces and filters should be sought in microscopy as well as in flow cytometry. The quantitative influence is reported of each of these variables on the eventual fluorescence intensity. New developments are appearing in IF technology. These include laser-scan microscopy, point-addressable optical sensors, phosphorescence microscopy and more sophisticated flow cytometers that allow some morphometry. The possible uses of these systems is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82135/tno-230506
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations.

Joost J. Haaijman
10 citations
PubMed
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
article

Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations.

Joost J. Haaijman
article en
10 citations

Abstract

The combination of the specificity of the antigen-antibody interaction with the sensitivity of fluorescence detection and quantitation yields one of the most widely applicable analytical tools in cell biology. Immunofluorescence (IF) signals can be measured with microscopes or flow cytometers. Choice for either of the two systems depends on the type of preparation (cells, tissues, etc.), on the type of required information (morphology, distribution, quantitation) and on the number and quality of the samples. In IF a choice has to be made for the most appropriate fluorochromes, reagents, equipment and preparative procedure, respectively, the right balance between lightsource, objective, eye pieces and filters should be sought in microscopy as well as in flow cytometry. The quantitative influence is reported of each of these variables on the eventual fluorescence intensity. New developments are appearing in IF technology. These include laser-scan microscopy, point-addressable optical sensors, phosphorescence microscopy and more sophisticated flow cytometers that allow some morphometry. The possible uses of these systems is discussed.

PubMedVol. 35
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations. — Joost J. Haaijman · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS