The role of landscape, topography, and geodiversity in explaining vascular plant species richness in a fragmented landscape

We explained vascular plant species richness patterns in a 286 km(2) fragmented landscape with a notable human influence. The objective of this study was two-fold: to test the relative importance of landscape, topography and geodiversity measures, and to compare three different landscape-type variables in species richness modeling. Moreover, we tested if results differ when only native species are considered. We used generalized linear modeling based variation partitioning and generalized additive models with different explanatory variable sets. Landscape and topography explained the majority of the variation but the relative importance of topography and geodiversity was higher in explaining native species richness than in explaining total species richness. Differences between the three landscape type variables were small and they provided complementary information. Finally, topography and geodiversity often direct human action and can be ultimate causes behind both landscape variability and species richness patterns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60910/2gbw-mq8t
Citations
27
Primary Topic
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of landscape, topography, and geodiversity in explaining vascular plant species richness in a fragmented landscape

Aleksi Räsänen, Tuomo Kuitunen, Jan Hjort, Anssi Lensu et al.
27 citations
Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
3.34
article

The role of landscape, topography, and geodiversity in explaining vascular plant species richness in a fragmented landscape

Aleksi Räsänen, Tuomo Kuitunen, Jan Hjort, Anssi Lensu, Markku Kuitunen, Asta Vaso
article en
27 citations

Abstract

We explained vascular plant species richness patterns in a 286 km(2) fragmented landscape with a notable human influence. The objective of this study was two-fold: to test the relative importance of landscape, topography and geodiversity measures, and to compare three different landscape-type variables in species richness modeling. Moreover, we tested if results differ when only native species are considered. We used generalized linear modeling based variation partitioning and generalized additive models with different explanatory variable sets. Landscape and topography explained the majority of the variation but the relative importance of topography and geodiversity was higher in explaining native species richness than in explaining total species richness. Differences between the three landscape type variables were small and they provided complementary information. Finally, topography and geodiversity often direct human action and can be ultimate causes behind both landscape variability and species richness patterns.

Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)Vol. 21
Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö, Jyväskylän Yliopisto
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.