Upper Bounds for the I-MSE and max-MSE of Kernel Density Estimators

The performance of kernel density estimators is usually studied via Taylor expansions and asymptotic approximation arguments, in which the bandwidth parameter tends to zero with increasing sample size. In contrast, this paper focusses directly on the finite-sample situation. Informative upper bounds are derived both for the integrated and the maximal mean squared error function. Results are reached for the traditional case, where the kernel is a probability density function, under various sets of assumptions on the underlying density to be estimated. Results are also derived for the important non-conventional case of the sinc kernel, which is not integrable and also takes negative values. We pin-point ways in which the sinc-based estimator performs better than the conventional kernel estimators. When proving our results we rely on methods related to characteristic and empirical characteristic functions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2602.20815
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upper Bounds for the I-MSE and max-MSE of Kernel Density Estimators

Nils Lid Hjort, N. G. Ushakov
2 citations
ArXiv.org
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Upper Bounds for the I-MSE and max-MSE of Kernel Density Estimators

Nils Lid Hjort, N. G. Ushakov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The performance of kernel density estimators is usually studied via Taylor expansions and asymptotic approximation arguments, in which the bandwidth parameter tends to zero with increasing sample size. In contrast, this paper focusses directly on the finite-sample situation. Informative upper bounds are derived both for the integrated and the maximal mean squared error function. Results are reached for the traditional case, where the kernel is a probability density function, under various sets of assumptions on the underlying density to be estimated. Results are also derived for the important non-conventional case of the sinc kernel, which is not integrable and also takes negative values. We pin-point ways in which the sinc-based estimator performs better than the conventional kernel estimators. When proving our results we rely on methods related to characteristic and empirical characteristic functions.

ArXiv.org
Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Universitetet i Oslo
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Upper Bounds for the I-MSE and max-MSE of Kernel Density Estimators — Nils Lid Hjort, N. G. Ushakov · ArXiv.org (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS