Who Is the Client in Forensics?

Who the client is in a forensic rehabilitation evaluation has been the source of confusion and much debate among expert witnesses for many years. In an attempt to clarify the issue, several leaders within the rehabilitation forensic practice setting met in Las Vegas, Nevada on November 4, 2007 to review the various definitions of client among the codes of ethics to which forensic certificants or professional members adhere. The goal of the work group was to identify and define the intent of the relationship among the parties in a legal matter and to offer definitions to clarify those relationships utilizing terminology that might be universally accepted by certification and membership bodies to which many rehabilitation expert witnesses belong. This white paper addresses the history of the issue, the conflict caused by competing definitions, and offers a definition that has been accepted and ratified by the American Board of Vocational Experts, the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, and the International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Life Care Planning
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.151425
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Is the Client in Forensics?

Jeffrey Carlisle, Mary Barros-Bailey, Ann Wallace, Robert W. Taylor et al.
7 citations
Journal of Life Care Planning
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
15.98
article

Who Is the Client in Forensics?

Jeffrey Carlisle, Mary Barros-Bailey, Ann Wallace, Robert W. Taylor, Ann T. Neulicht, Michael Graham
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Who the client is in a forensic rehabilitation evaluation has been the source of confusion and much debate among expert witnesses for many years. In an attempt to clarify the issue, several leaders within the rehabilitation forensic practice setting met in Las Vegas, Nevada on November 4, 2007 to review the various definitions of client among the codes of ethics to which forensic certificants or professional members adhere. The goal of the work group was to identify and define the intent of the relationship among the parties in a legal matter and to offer definitions to clarify those relationships utilizing terminology that might be universally accepted by certification and membership bodies to which many rehabilitation expert witnesses belong. This white paper addresses the history of the issue, the conflict caused by competing definitions, and offers a definition that has been accepted and ratified by the American Board of Vocational Experts, the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, and the International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals.

Journal of Life Care PlanningVol. 7(3)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), United States Army War College (US), RED Consulting (Norway) (NO), CS Diagnostics (DE), Instituto Profesional De Ciencias Y Artes (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.