What North Atlantic Triangle?

This article questions the notion of the North Atlantic Triangle as developed by John Bartlet Brebner and asks whether it ever really existed in the form that he suggested. It examines Brebner’s motives in advancing the triangular concept and finds them to be rooted in a view of Canadian history that eschewed a nationalist emphasis favouring either the USA or the British Empire. It also suggests that there is a basic flaw in the North Atlantic Triangle idea, in that relations between the three parties have been generally benign and that all three parties accepted the triangle notion, whereas the fundamental direction of US policy towards Canada since 1776 has been to break the link between Britain and Canada. Cooperation between the USA, Canada and Britain was at its height when Brebner wrote his book and chose the title North Atlantic Triangle and, for that reason, the phrase was a period piece. It may have its uses in the fields of diplomacy and international relations but it needs to be interpreted much more broadly than Brebner managed to do if it is to be of value in fully understanding the history of the North Atlantic world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
London Journal of Canadian Studies
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2025v38.003
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Canadian Identity and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What North Atlantic Triangle?

Gordon T. Stewart
3 citations
London Journal of Canadian Studies
Canadian Identity and History
article

What North Atlantic Triangle?

Gordon T. Stewart
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article questions the notion of the North Atlantic Triangle as developed by John Bartlet Brebner and asks whether it ever really existed in the form that he suggested. It examines Brebner’s motives in advancing the triangular concept and finds them to be rooted in a view of Canadian history that eschewed a nationalist emphasis favouring either the USA or the British Empire. It also suggests that there is a basic flaw in the North Atlantic Triangle idea, in that relations between the three parties have been generally benign and that all three parties accepted the triangle notion, whereas the fundamental direction of US policy towards Canada since 1776 has been to break the link between Britain and Canada. Cooperation between the USA, Canada and Britain was at its height when Brebner wrote his book and chose the title North Atlantic Triangle and, for that reason, the phrase was a period piece. It may have its uses in the fields of diplomacy and international relations but it needs to be interpreted much more broadly than Brebner managed to do if it is to be of value in fully understanding the history of the North Atlantic world.

London Journal of Canadian StudiesVol. 38(1)
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Canadian Identity and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.