Building a Record: Amending Activity, Position Taking, and the Seventeenth Amendment

Reelection is frequently viewed as the most important goal for members of Congress, and to be reelected, members take positions that are in line with that of their constituencies. We argue that position taking behavior of United States senators should have changed to accommodate a new electoral constituency after the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment. Specifically, we look at amending activity by members of Congress before and after the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment. By offering amendments on the floor, members can ensure certain issues get discussed and solidify their positions with their constituents. To examine our hypotheses, we examine a dataset of all amendments that received a roll call vote in either chamber from the 59th (1905–1907) to the 68th Congress (1923–1925). Our results provide support for our theoretical claims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000118
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a Record: Amending Activity, Position Taking, and the Seventeenth Amendment

Joel Sievert, Mark Owens, Ryan D. Williamson, Anthony J. Madonna et al.
2 citations
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Building a Record: Amending Activity, Position Taking, and the Seventeenth Amendment

Joel Sievert, Mark Owens, Ryan D. Williamson, Anthony J. Madonna, Jamie L. Carson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Reelection is frequently viewed as the most important goal for members of Congress, and to be reelected, members take positions that are in line with that of their constituencies. We argue that position taking behavior of United States senators should have changed to accommodate a new electoral constituency after the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment. Specifically, we look at amending activity by members of Congress before and after the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment. By offering amendments on the floor, members can ensure certain issues get discussed and solidify their positions with their constituents. To examine our hypotheses, we examine a dataset of all amendments that received a roll call vote in either chamber from the 59th (1905–1907) to the 68th Congress (1923–1925). Our results provide support for our theoretical claims.

Journal of Political Institutions and Political EconomyVol. 6(1)
Baldwin Wallace University (US), Texas Tech University (US), Office of International Affairs (US), Citadel (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.